.
Feedback

Wells-Sherman House gets OK to Move to North Water Street

Planning commission approves site plan for house at 247 N. Water St.

After months of debate, members of the non-profit  Kent Wells Sherman House Inc. have the OK to move a historic house with ties to the city's namesake family to the lot at 247 N. Water St.

The Kent Planning Commission voted 3-2 Tuesday to approve a site plan for the lot that situates the house 13.5 feet back from the sidewalk. The lot is the green space between the gallery and the building downtown.

The issue has appeared before several of the city's citizen planning boards in recent months as members of the non-profit worked to save it from demolition. The house had to be to make way for , which saw the

The relocation plan has proven controversial because the green space at 247 N. Water St. has been used and maintained for about 20 years by members of SRCA with permission of the landowner.

Roger Thurman, vice president of the Kent Wells-Sherman House board, said the group pledges to be good neighbors to SRCA by making the house and lot available to the arts group.

"We’re going to be the best neighbors possible to Standing Rock because they’re really good people in that organization," he said.

Thurman said they have a purchase agreement with the landowner, Arthur Properties Management LLC, to buy the land for $20,000.

The non-profit group can essentially start prepping the site and move the house once they have ownership, the necessary permits are isssued and moving arrangements — such as temporarily moving utilities and traffic signals — are made.

When asked about future collaboration, Standing Rock Cultural Arts Director Jeff Ingram said after the meeting he plans to try and find another location for the house while preparations are made for its move.

"It's not over," Ingram said.

University officials have said the house must be moved from its temporary location on East College Avenue by Dec. 1 or it will be razed.

Kent Planning Engineer Jennifer Barone said the group could always return to the planning commission if another location is deemed suitable.

A close vote

The site plan for North Water Street passed by one vote. Planning commission members Gregory Balbierz, Anthony Catalano and Melissa Long voted to approve the site plan. Members Peter Paino and John Gargan voted against approving the site plan.

In casting their votes, members of the planning commission tried to carefully articulate their reasoning. Although even Paino conceded the house's planned use as commercial and public space is a legally permitted use in the city's commercial downtown district.

Paino said that while he had to adhere to city code requirements in making his decision he also had to consider public input.

"Which was a compelling argument to keep the green space, and reasons why," Paino said. "I would really like to see this building put on another lot."

Catalano said his decision was based primarily on the fact the house is a permitted use on the lot within the downtown zoning district.

"This is a final vote on this motion," Catalano said.

The planning commission that set the house 15 feet back from the sidewalk. So members of the Kent Wells Sherman House board to propose setting the house 16 inches back from the sidewalk in order to present the issue to the commission again for consideration.

A divisive issue

Excluding Thurman, 19 people spoke to the planning commission about the site plan proposal Tuesday night. Three of those who spoke supported moving the house to the North Water Street site while the remaining 16 favored keeping the green space whole.

Balbierz said that, despite the overwhelming public opposition, the Kent community appeared split evenly over the issue.

"One of the items that is perplexing to me is we have numerous letters from the public … It is 50-50 between strong support for the Kent Wells-Sherman House Inc. group as well as an equal amount for Standing Rock," Balbierz said.

Supporters of the relocation plan who spoke Tuesday often suggested that both groups could find a win-win situation with the house on the lot.

Kent resident Doug Fuller said the house only occupies about one-third of the site and leaves two thirds available for use.

"There’s still tremendous opportunity for the cultural arts to thrive on that site … and for these two things to work very nicely together," Fuller said.

But many supporters of the green space insisted the best situation for SRCA's programming and activities is to leave the lot fully devoid of structures.

Ian Broadhead, a history major at Kent State, said he believes there's a fundamental disagreement between the two groups about what a compromise would be.

"For us a win-win doesn’t mean we get some of the lot," he said.

Kent attorney John Plough said his father, a curator for the Portage County Historical Society, taught him as a child that preserving history is important.

"But he didn’t teach me to preserve history at the expense of destroying something that’s so precious to so many people," Plough said. "I think that’s what we’ve got here."

Future use

Thurman said they can't just provide unfettered use of the lot to SRCA because of insurance concerns, and he said they would need a formal agreement in place for the arts group to use the lot.

"We have a tenant for the upstairs," Thurman said. "We’ve got to defray costs and earn some money to pay for the sustenance of the building. It’s kind of like the model where they have used the restaurant to pay for the maintenance and longevity of the building."

Members of the Kent Wells Sherman House Inc. estimate the costs to move the house to the site and make it compliant with city code requirements is about $190,000. The estimated cost to renovate the interior and exterior is about $100,000.

Kent State has agreed to make $40,000 available towards the house's relocation. Kent City Council voted to make a $15,000 loan available. The non-profit plans to obtain financing from Hometown Bank for the bulk of the initial costs while also relying on donations to pay for the nearly $200,000 estimated cost to move the house and make it a functioning structure.

Thurman said they plan to do as little excavation as possible on the site to set down the house.

"We’ve offered (Standing Rock) use of the first floor for some of their activities," he said. "And we believe a tiny, tiny fraction of Standing Rock's overall activities will be effected by this house and will add to their potential activities by being there and being a good neighbor."

Fred Pierre September 5, 2012 at 02:17 pm
The loan funding from Home Savings is contingent on having committed commercial tenants. Architect Allan Orashan and attorney Nancy Grim agreed to rent space in the house.
Roger Thurman September 5, 2012 at 02:55 pm
Allan's office is at Century 21 and he created the agreement between KWHS and the tenant. He has never planned or intended to rent that space.
Jim Williams September 5, 2012 at 05:04 pm
Seems to me that this is a case study in how local government works. Both sides had their say in the matter. KWSH had to be denied permission first, then go back and draw up a compromise solution, which the planning commission accepted. In the interim, SRCA made their case, and had the opportunity to step in and make a counter offer, but in the end, the decision, and the property, didn't go their way. C'est la vie. Kudos to both sides for making strong arguments civilly, now let's see you both pull together to achieve the best outcome possible!
Pamela Cheekins September 5, 2012 at 05:55 pm
no but you can feel the warmth of the heat in the Wells-Sherman House in the middle of winter that is for sure. That land is useless for most of the year but now it will be functional year round. Homeless people were loitering on the greenspace? That's what I thought I was seeing there. Get them off of this private property. The city made important progress with this decision.
Fred Pierre September 5, 2012 at 06:40 pm
I stand corrected.
Fred Pierre September 5, 2012 at 06:45 pm
Hi Jim! No, KWSH submitted a very similar proposal, with the result moving the house two and a half feet closer to the sidewalk. The city's attorney directed the city council and planning commission to ignore emotional appeals from the public, and only judge proposals on financials and permitted use, and SRCA was not allowed to make an offer to purchase the property.
Pat September 5, 2012 at 07:45 pm
I am so glad to see that the Wells-Sherman has gotten the go ahead. Each time I passed that so called Green Space I think it needs to go--not sure how this piece of property has been let go for so long so the hippies have a place to hang out--try the city parks or under the Main Street Bridge. The building on the north side of the green space should be forced to clean up the outside and clean the windows--whole area is pretty discusting /
Elizabeth Banster September 5, 2012 at 08:26 pm
Remember though, it is not so much that the Standing Rock people were right on this issue it's just that they were LOUD on this issue.
Erin LaBelle September 5, 2012 at 08:42 pm
@ Pamela- Seriously? All that I meant is that the space is accessible without a key all the time even if one is homeless. The building will not be. It was not a gathering place specifically for the homeless-who are people just like you I might add. @ Pat- All I can say is that the folks you refer to as "hippies" are educators, writers, artists, musicians, activists, children and people who operate from a place that is still connected to their heart, nature and each other. Live and let live would be a healthier approach to living in community which is what Kent is.
Traci Monroe September 5, 2012 at 09:16 pm
They had 20 years to make an offer, they chose not too.
Jim Williams September 5, 2012 at 09:44 pm
Fred, similar and the same are, in fact, different, which is what was asked of them. Whether it's a couple of feet, or raising the foundation a bit, or whatever, they were told no for the first plans, and yes for the second. And, yes, the government should try to avoid emotional appeals over the law, since that's their job. The supporters of SRCA did their job, too, which was to make their best case for sparing the land, but their arguments fell short. Like I said, kudos to both sides for doing this in a (mostly) civil manner. It reflects well on the community.
I'm curious, though; why wasn't SRCA allowed to make an offer? Who made that restriction - the seller? Was a serious attempt made, (i.e., money offered) or was it just a question posed to the seller as a potential?
Pat September 5, 2012 at 09:56 pm
Erin, I am not saying that the people who attend gatherings at the green space are not eduacated. But most of the people need to join the establishment. I am a former hippie and I hear exactly what you are saying. But the older residents sees you green space for hippies and they have not so fond memories of that generation did to Kent in the late 60's and early 70's.
William B Budner ESQ. September 5, 2012 at 10:48 pm
JOIN THE ESTABLISHMENT! (puts blinders on)
Aurelia Stone September 5, 2012 at 11:15 pm
I really wish some of you people would realize just how important green space is. What's so wrong with hippies and homeless people and whoever else having a natural place to dance and play and drum and make art and meditate..what are you people afraid of?? I mean Seriously why is green space not the most important thing ever!! It hurts my heart that this very precious beautiful green space is taken away. :(
Patricia September 5, 2012 at 11:34 pm
Both sides are trying to do the same thing; one is saving green space and another is saving a historic home. The SFCA will be offered use of the downstairs space and I think it would be great to see some of the art from the gallery hanging on clean, uncluttered walls. @Pat, these are great people and as an old hippie I have very, very fond memories of that area of town.
Jennifer Cline September 6, 2012 at 02:01 pm
LOUD meaning community members are compelled to voice their opinions. It only makes sense when public funds are being used for a project, that public voice is needed for effective decision making.
Fred Pierre September 6, 2012 at 02:06 pm
At the time that SRCA found out that the property was for sale, a purchase agreement had already been signed between the current owner and the TransPortage organization, so no other offers could be presented. I admit we could have tried harder to purchase the property in earlier years, however up until recently there was a different owner who was preserved it as an appreciating asset.
Fred Pierre September 6, 2012 at 02:09 pm
Are you demeaning those college students and local business owners who support the arts? Or just the ones who choose to dress colorfully? Or those from Ghana, Egypt and the African-American community who dress in traditional garments?
Sue September 6, 2012 at 02:56 pm
I have mixed feelings. I support the preservation of the house. Initially I was appalled by the supporters of Standing Rock Cultural Arts for insisting that they have squatters rights to property they neither own nor rent. But then I listened to how much the Standing Rock Cultural Arts supporters love this small patch of land and how lovingly they have tended it. Now I feel sad about the conflict this has generated and about how much the loss of this land will affect people who have enjoyed it for many years. It probably won't happen, but I hope that someone finds another suitable and affordable location for the Wells-Sherman House in the nick of time and that people from the two groups can work together instead of fighting each other.
Fred Pierre September 6, 2012 at 05:25 pm
To clarify, I was conflating the two key meetings: City Council where the city's attorney told council that they should only listen to financial arguments against the North Water Street property purchase, and the Planning Commission meeting, where the city's attorney told the commission that they should only listen to arguments about the permitted usage. Of course, we elect and appoint these people to represent our wishes, and not to cower before imaginary legal threats. Our legal counsel should serve us, not serve us up.
Mary September 6, 2012 at 05:54 pm
16 spoke against the move and 3 for it? And they opted for the move? Good ol' Kent...
Maybe we should remove "Tree City" from our town lingo. Kent seems to be removing more trees, descimating greenspace in favor of putting up vast cement wastelands that offer nothing but more storm water runnoff.
Patricia September 7, 2012 at 01:19 am
The reason for the cost being so low is that much of the interior work is being done by volunteers and grant money is also available for historic renovation.
Delores Umbridge September 7, 2012 at 03:17 pm
Patricia, grants for historic renovation will require that the building meet some level of historic accuracy to the renovations, which will jack up the price of the renovations, and depending on volunteers means that an organization has to build support, not be bombastic and divisive. Likely the $100K figure will inflate significantly, as typically happens when dealing with a historic house.
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:20 am
For those who have been following and following ordinances and codes, this is a case study in corruption.
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:23 am
How many of you make offers for land that have no for sale signs in them? Anyone with ethics might improperly assume that an owner who allows people who use and take care of the land for 20 years would offer them first option of the land. It's a weak argument for running over a community, especially if the owner has not spoken.
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:24 am
Why didn't friends of the house offer the owner of the house money to buy it before it was up for demolition?
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:28 am
That house is not gonna make a bit of difference in the buildings around it especially with nearly all of the businesses around it opposing it.
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:29 am
Wow, you need to come out of the 60s and 70s because it sounds like you're the one stuck there.
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:30 am
Actually SRCA stated at the meetings that they are trying to save both. Only one group wants to run the other and all the area residents over.
Misty Jones September 9, 2012 at 03:31 am
Hope so too, Sue, but offering to purchase property is not what people who claim squatter's rights do.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kent Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Linda Davis, founder of Loved Ones of Prisoners, a support group for families.
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Linda, Kudos! Tough subject to not only approach but create a whole support group. I'm going toRead More pass judgement and say I think you are great!
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Paula, While I believe there are truly good people out there who have nothing but the bestRead More intentions for others, this story does not shock nor surprise me. I attended meetings with a friend who was court ordered. They couldn't drive and I figured I would sit with them instead of driving back and forth. AA claims not to be a religious sect but all the meetings and steps center around God. Not that I have a problem with God, but some people don't believe. Our courts (Judges) sentence people to attend meetings for DUI. I find this sad and irresponsible. One, it's religion. Two, you are sending alcoholics in to a group of other alcoholics who are not trained to help people with addiction. AA teaches people they are "helpless and powerless". Really? An individual has to find strength from within to fight the addiction. Telling people they are helpless isn't going to help. Alcoholism is usually tied to mental issues or illness. Going into a room and listening to other people's depressing rock bottom stories made me want to leave and go drink. Paradise Club....... hmmmmmmm...... I am not surprised. The only reason these court ordered sessions continue is that it doesn't cost the court any money. DUI's are a money maker for the courts, police and all the attorney's out there. Ah, but that's another story. I hope there is a happy ending for all of those above and others like them who have suffered under the guise of AA.
Amber Rodriguez June 13, 2013 at 12:30 am
I just want to let people know that Dandelion has been found, thank all of you who expressed concernRead More and kept your eyes out for him.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Does this not qualify? We're also the only news agency to report if he actually had an explosiveRead More device on him or not. Stories similar to what you've asked for almost all appeared last week. http://kent.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/man-arrested-after-threatening-to-set-off-bomb-at-kent-state_593fe0c4
Dave June 5, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Maybe it is just the start to a slow summer or a sign that there is nothing interesting going on inRead More Kent. The story you mentioned turned out to be pretty uneventful and more about a guy making false, not real, threats. The two stories that have seen the most face-time have been KRHS's valedictorian and the med helicopter. Maybe highlight achievements and products of local businesses we don't hear about. Run an interesting historical piece. Not trying to be argumentative but rather making a comment that the information provided as of late has been less than interesting.
amelfo June 7, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Matt -- no need to defend yourself. Considerate of you to respond, though.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 05:12 pm
It seems hardly anyone ever waits until the end of the procession to congratulate all the graduatesRead More at once.
lost cat is on the left in the photo
Patricia June 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I posted it to FB too, I live on Wolcott and I saw the flyer yesterday on a pole.
janetstavole June 4, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to everyone who is helping and has helped. Emmie is still missing but it helps to know soRead More many are looking out for her and us. Thanks again! Janet Stavole
janetstavole June 5, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Happy to report my cat was found....in a friends garage across 43 and about one quarter of a mileRead More away. Thanks to all of you who reposted our information on Facebook. Janet Stavole
Sue May 8, 2013 at 01:47 am
The school levy has passed. This is great news for the children of Kent. Thanks to everyone whoRead More voted for the levy.
Jim Williams May 8, 2013 at 02:05 am
Glad to see that 17% of Kent citizens were able to muster the energy to bother voting, and that theRead More majority of those few supported this very important issue. Congrats to the District for making the convincing argument. It's pretty clear that the chorus of "NO" that exists here on Patch is not representative of the majority.
Concerned Citizen May 8, 2013 at 02:58 am
Good voting LD
Teresa K. April 25, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I'm glad the League did their research. Have they ever researched and said: "no, we dont feelRead More the levy is needed?" For most of us, our research need only go as far as our wallets and income. If the schools with their million dollar budgets are feeling the crunch, imagine how average or lower average income homes are struggling. I am very suspect of the excellent w/ distincton rating and the asking of this levy at this time. How were we able to get that kind of incredible rating with NO ADDED FUNDS? Did the teachers wake up last year? Did the kids wake up? How did the school get such superior ratings THAT year and none in previous ones? why such a huge gap in time and ratings? The days of passing every school levy "just because", "we've never said no", "for the kids" or to keep our "property values" are over. The economy took care of that. No matter how you feel about the levy: PLEASE VOTE.
Sa;;y April 25, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I urge my fellow residents to send a message to the school board: The Board needs to face the factRead More of the current economic conditions involving the residents in the Kent city school district and come back with a request for a more reasonable millage. Otherwise, I think the levy will fail. Our city leaders encouraged businesses to come into the new development by granting concessions on taxes. Well, there goes the additional money!
Sue May 7, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Vote YES today for Kent children. Yes on the school levy.