.
Feedback

POLL: Landlords Could be Responsible for 'College Fest 2' Emergency Response

Students organizing to clean street after anticipated block party this weekend

Richard Martinez, a sophomore student, didn't go to "College Fest" last weekend.

And he's not planning to attend "" this weekend.

But he will be cleaning up the leftover smashed cans and broken glass strewn about the street afterward if the unsanctioned block party happens.

Martinez and fellow Kent State student Jacob Ruby are organizing the "College St. Clean-Up" starting at noon Sunday to pick up trash and debris expected to be left behind if the 3,000 people who say they're planning to attend the party actually show.

Martinez said he and Ruby were talking about how the unsanctioned end of-the-year block party gets out of hand when the topic of trash came up.

"Jake said he was going to bring a bunch of trash bags Sunday morning and start picking up all the trash, and I said how cool it would be if a bunch of people came and helped out," Martinez said. "So, I made a Facebook event out of it and we soon realized just how mutual this feeling was when the attendees quickly increased well past our expectations."

As of Friday morning, 144 people said they planned to take part in the after-party cleaning with another 37 people saying they might attend.

Martinez said he would like to donate the recycling revenue from the bottles and cans to a local charity if they can figure out a way to do so.

The sophomore communication studies major attended since kindergarten and calls the Tree City home, so he wants it to keep its lush green, attractive look.

"My city is important to me, so I'm happy to play a part in this service for my community and I appreciate the interest and enthusiasm everyone has for this event," Martinez said. "It pleases me to know there are so many people in this city alone who actually want to be a part of this cause because it takes some of the spotlight away from College Fest itself and shines it on a more admirable tradition."

Landlords responsible?

Kent Police Chief Michelle Lee issued a statement Thursday advising residents that the police department is preparing for another round of parties this weekend after a Facebook page was set up for "College Fest 2012 #2."

As of Friday morning, 2,370 people planned to attend, according to the page.

In the statement, the police chief said the city's law director has taken steps to notify College Street property owners that any law enforcement response to their properties "could be their financial burden to bear."

Lee cited chapter 561 of the Kent Codified Ordinances under "Criminal Activity Nuisances."

The code section states that if two or more nuisance activities, as defined in the chapter, occur at the same address within a six-month period, then the property is declared a nuisance property and the owner is advised.

"The notice and order shall set forth the nature of the nuisances, the estimated costs to abate any future nuisance, and state that the owner may avoid being charged the costs of abatement by taking steps to prevent any further nuisance activity as set forth in this chapter," the code reads. "The notice shall further state that if a third or subsequent nuisance activity as declared in this Section occurs within six months of the dates of the earlier of first two activities, the city may abate the nuisance by responding to the activities using administrative and law enforcement actions, and the costs of such abatement shall be assessed on the nuisance property."

The emergency cost for Kent police and fire to respond to last weekend's events was about $12,000. The was estimated at $26,000.

Lee said the police department is committed to protecting "the life and liberty of its residents" and is prepared to combat any disruptive gatherings.

"I want to reassure the community that their police department is prepared to prevent nuisance and criminal activity and take enforcement action when necessary," Lee said. "This is the core mission and purpose of law enforcement; to protect our citizens."

b April 27, 2012 at 02:50 pm
Thank you for reporting this and clearing things up.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) April 27, 2012 at 02:58 pm
You're welcome. Please note our terms of use, which prohibit personal attacks against other readers. http://kent.patch.com/terms
Sally Burnell April 27, 2012 at 04:09 pm
Why fine the landlords? Make the actual people who caused the problem in the first place pony up, that being the students. Take away their beer money and they may think twice about causing problems in the future. Recoup the city losses by making the troublemakers pay for their misdeeds. That $26,000 spent last weekend could have gone to help pay for things like street and sidewalk repair that will now have to be delayed or cancelled due to budgetary constraints put on the city by rowdy student partiers. It's time for the city to step up and take a stand that this kind of thing will no longer be tolerated. Fine the students. Period. No ands, ifs or buts about it. Be bold. Otherwise, this kind of thing will continue unabated. And furthermore, fine student rentals if they do not clean up the trash in their yards and levy even more fines if they fail to do so within a proscribed amount of time. It's time for our city to adopt a "get tough" approach to hooligans who give our city a bad name and trash our neighborhoods. No more just putting up with the same old stuff year in, year out. With the city hurting for money, these costly parties are straining an already badly stretched budget and the trash in yards and on streets is becoming both a nuisance and a public health and safety hazard. It's time for someone to step up to the plate and announce that from now on, fines will be levied for misbehavior on the part of the student tenants who live in our neighborhoods and trash yards.
bill budner April 27, 2012 at 07:11 pm
haha oh that "b" up there, better change their name. they must not know the stigma and utter hate attached to that user name.
Paxton Crenshaw April 27, 2012 at 07:43 pm
while some may hate, others stand in awe...
Pat April 27, 2012 at 08:03 pm
Of course fine the landloards. They are the ones responsuble for their tenants. No deposits back when they move out. Why should my tax dollars go to the rowdy students who have no reguard for the town they are visiting. I am so ready for the brats to go home and hopefully not to return next year.
bill budner April 27, 2012 at 08:31 pm
awww eryone hates ksu, boo hoo.
Teresa K. April 28, 2012 at 04:12 am
dont fine the landlords! how absolutely ridiculous.
Just me April 28, 2012 at 11:55 am
No, the landlords already pay property tax, have to get housing inspections and repair all the damage incurred by these raucous students. I think it could all be handled with less fanfare, I don't think swat is needed it would be unfortunate if a real event/emergency occurred and they were busy playing with the drunks.
Laurel Myers Hurst April 28, 2012 at 01:19 pm
If city ordinance states that 2 or more nuisance "abatements" warrant a probationary period of six months and that a further abatement during that six month period will come with a bill for enforcement services, then I'd guess more landlords will be on their property or hire their own security forces when parties are scheduled to occur. Sounds like an excellent plan! No landlord will be forced to pay for enforcement services unless they ignore that excessive partying will occur/is occurring.
Pat April 28, 2012 at 01:56 pm
I watched the students become out of control and throwing bottles at the police, setting fires, breaking windows--completely out of control on May 1-4, 1970. Does the University want another May 4th???? These students need to control their actions and yes an armed truck is needed as the students are more violent than they were in 1970!
Teresa K. April 28, 2012 at 02:58 pm
@pat: who would you send the bill to for the 1970 mess?
Yes, I watched the rioters back then and I watched the people bussed in for the occassion help ruin the town that weekend. Landlords pay property tax for the privilege of owning a house in this lovely town and most property owners pay Kent City income tax too. What are taxes for if not for the services of our fire and police depts? No, I am not a landlord.
jim April 28, 2012 at 06:48 pm
hey bill bud what do you mean by "b"? Could you clarify what you're saying? It sounds like you're threatening a commentor?
jim April 28, 2012 at 07:16 pm
If Kent wants to fine landlords it will only encourage more of this behavior because of animosity between some. This will give some thugs the perfect opportunity to trash our community& have someone else pay the bill for it!
I worked for a licensed rental, and it took months for us to get rid of someone who didn't even have a lease, he was squatting! As if that weren't bad enough, we were required to have a lawyer there in court who literally would simply repeat our answers(except we got some idiot who couldn't even do that!). The more inaccessable the courts become for the ordinary citizen the more alternative methods will be found. It would have been easier to hire a private security co. to throw him out! Also, if the city doesn't think that their "uber" machismo response of swat teams and concusion grenades and tear gas isn't adding to the escalation, think again! Every num nut that wants a thrill now knows where to go! Thanks alot guys!
jim April 28, 2012 at 07:26 pm
Comparing protesting a draft for an un just war that was forcing you or your friends or family member into killing someone or being killed thousands of miles away for a cause you did not believe in to these stupid, "fight for right to party" drunken brawls,
I think, is way out of line, and disrespects the innocent people shot on that day, shame on you!
dee April 28, 2012 at 10:49 pm
The police response was warranted and appropriate. Several people were bloodied in fights and police were met with flying bottles and other objects. Do emergency responders have to be wounded or killed before they get your support? Police did a good job of quickly shuting down an out of control party/riot . Had the riot continued and someone had gotten seriously hurt, the police would get blamed as well. A porch did collapse and porch roofs likely were in danger of collapsing due to the number of people on them. If this event occured in certain sections of say Cleveland, it would not be referred to as a "celebration". This despicable College Fest hides behind the memory of May 4 and has been given special privilege to violate the law. It's time for the college and city to take action. I have heard that these houses are rented by groups of students who use them only as party houses, not as residences. If true, these landlords are aware and should be held accountable. The renters and the people arrested should be responsible for cleaning up the properties and street as well.
h April 29, 2012 at 12:40 am
I have personal experience that if u allow someone to stay at your house for any reason for any number of nights, you suddenly legally are their landlord and must legally evicted them. I could not get the police to agree to take a peaceful squatting drunk off my property without them threatening to arrest me!!! In Kent!! Recently!! How will any landlord keep 3000 hostile drunks off their property??? The assumption that landlords could now control what has gotten out of hand, without police and ksu intervention is rediculous. Planning , cooperation, intervention, and logic are what is needed now.
bill budner April 29, 2012 at 08:07 pm
jim, please use reading comprehension skills before commenting on something.
h April 30, 2012 at 01:41 am
as a landlord, in a state where it takes MONTHS to evict someone, i do not think that owning a rental in this city would be profitable if i had to somehow know my renters schedule related to their 'plans to party' and to hire security for each of those parties. i certainly would not want to be on the property of my renters while they are partying, because that would be in violation of state law in that i would be harassing them by not giving them the space and privacy that they rented. this is all so stupid that this issue has gotten out of control (the reality of it not the conversation of it), that the event of 1970 has been turned into a riotous drunken festival, that ksu does nothing to quell the issue either by organization or disuation, and that it has become an online debate by people who are not really going to do anything about it. it all makes me sick.
Scott May 1, 2012 at 02:21 am
There is no such thing as landlords in the City of Kent renting to students..I would certainly define them as slumlords..have any of you ever even walked into one of these properties, most off campus housing leases go for about 400 a month, 7 or so tenents, thats over 30,000 dollars a year...a year, so what might the condition of these homes be in..broken appliances, moldy bathroom tiles, stained rugs, lack of parking, windows that dont shut, heaters that break down in the winter, cockroaches that and crawling around the basement littered with trash....yes this is from contineous destruction from tenents..but it is the legal obligation for the landlord to make repairs on these properties which rarely happen...so over time...the problems are compounded, and never solved, sanction the slumlords of this city and youll get your true answers to why events like this happen!!!
Chris (Kit) Myers May 6, 2012 at 12:53 pm
"There is no such thing as landlords in the City of Kent renting to students." Scott, you know not what you say. In fact, as a person renting to students, I resent your spreading the "big lie" that we are all some sort of uncaring ogres. You have not been in my property. There are no broken appliances, moldy bathroom tiles, & etc.
Who are you, Scott? Why do you lump us all together? Where is your proof that I am a slumlord? People believe the falsehoods that people like you so blatently spread around town. Who are you that seems to know so much? Who are you, Scott? Just who are you?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kent Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Linda Davis, founder of Loved Ones of Prisoners, a support group for families.
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Linda, Kudos! Tough subject to not only approach but create a whole support group. I'm going toRead More pass judgement and say I think you are great!
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Paula, While I believe there are truly good people out there who have nothing but the bestRead More intentions for others, this story does not shock nor surprise me. I attended meetings with a friend who was court ordered. They couldn't drive and I figured I would sit with them instead of driving back and forth. AA claims not to be a religious sect but all the meetings and steps center around God. Not that I have a problem with God, but some people don't believe. Our courts (Judges) sentence people to attend meetings for DUI. I find this sad and irresponsible. One, it's religion. Two, you are sending alcoholics in to a group of other alcoholics who are not trained to help people with addiction. AA teaches people they are "helpless and powerless". Really? An individual has to find strength from within to fight the addiction. Telling people they are helpless isn't going to help. Alcoholism is usually tied to mental issues or illness. Going into a room and listening to other people's depressing rock bottom stories made me want to leave and go drink. Paradise Club....... hmmmmmmm...... I am not surprised. The only reason these court ordered sessions continue is that it doesn't cost the court any money. DUI's are a money maker for the courts, police and all the attorney's out there. Ah, but that's another story. I hope there is a happy ending for all of those above and others like them who have suffered under the guise of AA.
Amber Rodriguez June 13, 2013 at 12:30 am
I just want to let people know that Dandelion has been found, thank all of you who expressed concernRead More and kept your eyes out for him.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Does this not qualify? We're also the only news agency to report if he actually had an explosiveRead More device on him or not. Stories similar to what you've asked for almost all appeared last week. http://kent.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/man-arrested-after-threatening-to-set-off-bomb-at-kent-state_593fe0c4
Dave June 5, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Maybe it is just the start to a slow summer or a sign that there is nothing interesting going on inRead More Kent. The story you mentioned turned out to be pretty uneventful and more about a guy making false, not real, threats. The two stories that have seen the most face-time have been KRHS's valedictorian and the med helicopter. Maybe highlight achievements and products of local businesses we don't hear about. Run an interesting historical piece. Not trying to be argumentative but rather making a comment that the information provided as of late has been less than interesting.
amelfo June 7, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Matt -- no need to defend yourself. Considerate of you to respond, though.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 05:12 pm
It seems hardly anyone ever waits until the end of the procession to congratulate all the graduatesRead More at once.
lost cat is on the left in the photo
Patricia June 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I posted it to FB too, I live on Wolcott and I saw the flyer yesterday on a pole.
janetstavole June 4, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to everyone who is helping and has helped. Emmie is still missing but it helps to know soRead More many are looking out for her and us. Thanks again! Janet Stavole
janetstavole June 5, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Happy to report my cat was found....in a friends garage across 43 and about one quarter of a mileRead More away. Thanks to all of you who reposted our information on Facebook. Janet Stavole
Sue May 8, 2013 at 01:47 am
The school levy has passed. This is great news for the children of Kent. Thanks to everyone whoRead More voted for the levy.
Jim Williams May 8, 2013 at 02:05 am
Glad to see that 17% of Kent citizens were able to muster the energy to bother voting, and that theRead More majority of those few supported this very important issue. Congrats to the District for making the convincing argument. It's pretty clear that the chorus of "NO" that exists here on Patch is not representative of the majority.
Concerned Citizen May 8, 2013 at 02:58 am
Good voting LD
Teresa K. April 25, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I'm glad the League did their research. Have they ever researched and said: "no, we dont feelRead More the levy is needed?" For most of us, our research need only go as far as our wallets and income. If the schools with their million dollar budgets are feeling the crunch, imagine how average or lower average income homes are struggling. I am very suspect of the excellent w/ distincton rating and the asking of this levy at this time. How were we able to get that kind of incredible rating with NO ADDED FUNDS? Did the teachers wake up last year? Did the kids wake up? How did the school get such superior ratings THAT year and none in previous ones? why such a huge gap in time and ratings? The days of passing every school levy "just because", "we've never said no", "for the kids" or to keep our "property values" are over. The economy took care of that. No matter how you feel about the levy: PLEASE VOTE.
Sa;;y April 25, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I urge my fellow residents to send a message to the school board: The Board needs to face the factRead More of the current economic conditions involving the residents in the Kent city school district and come back with a request for a more reasonable millage. Otherwise, I think the levy will fail. Our city leaders encouraged businesses to come into the new development by granting concessions on taxes. Well, there goes the additional money!
Sue May 7, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Vote YES today for Kent children. Yes on the school levy.