Issue 2 Vote Follows Similar Debates in Wisconsin and New Jersey

Arguments in Ohio echo those made earlier in other states where public employee collective bargaining has been restricted

While debate intensifies in Columbus and regarding November’s vote on Issue 2 – which would restrict collective bargaining rights by public employees - the debate is one familiar in other states.

The Ohio version, signed into law earlier this year by Gov. John Kasich, followed measures championed in recent years by Republican governors in Wisconsin and New Jersey. 

In Wisconsin, passage of such measures sparked hard-fought campaigns to recall legislators who supported them, and in New Jersey, some proposals ran into stiff opposition in a statehouse controlled by Democrats.

In Ohio, union groups gathered enough signatures to force a November referendum on whether to overturn Kasich's work.

“It was part of a trend, many of the Republican governors elected in the last few years are reforming state and local government,” said John Green, the executive director of the Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron, in an interview with The Huffington Post. “Many of these reform packages have changes to bargaining as part of the reform process.”

Much debate over the law – which curtails the right of public employees to collectively bargain over certain benefits and makes other restrictions on what can be negotiated – echoes what was heard in Madison and Trenton during the earlier debates. Kasich’s argument that keeping the law is essential to balancing state and local budgets in an era of declining tax revenues is similar to what New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie used when pushing his own public employee proposals.

Similarly, arguments by Ohio unions that Kasich’s cuts to the state’s local government fund are the real cause of layoffs in local government echo what was heard in New Jersey when Christie cut local aid.

To explore these issues, Patch and The Huffington Post are collaborating on a series of articles regarding the Issue 2 referendum. This is the first installment in the series.

For the first installment of Huffington Post's coverage, please click here.

Coming Monday: Ohioans brace for an intense campaign, on the air and in your neighborhood, in the statewide referendum on curbing the power of public employees' unions

Robin Anderson October 03, 2011 at 02:07 PM
Only one part of SB-5 is targeted at all public employees and rightly so. That's the 33% reduction in paid sick days earned per year, from 15 to 10. Notice how the Administration is not touting just how much money that simple change is going to save public employers?
Noah Webster October 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM
I suggest you make a call to the editor. At least one other Patch editor in another NEO community openly admits to being on the left side of the aisle. Of course it is well documented that there is a strong liberal bias in all media, some more than others.
Peter Grossetti October 13, 2011 at 02:14 PM
@ Noah Webster - if that "one other Patch editor in NEO" is a registered voter, then he/she has every right to vote ANY way they want. Wouldn't you want the same if he/she we on your side of the aisle?
Harry H. October 28, 2011 at 03:00 AM
yes the unions are holding them back that is why all the teachers in the the state are against SB5. Please! not fooling anyone. we know that the real agenda is to brak the unions and lower the status of hard working middle class families. Unions are keeping the corrupt politicians from cannning good senior teachers in favor of cheaper less expenrienced ones.
Ward Benson October 28, 2011 at 03:09 AM
So, having those figures law bothers you why since you say they're already paying that amount?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »