.
Feedback

Interior Property Maintenance Code Approved by Council

Kent State supports adoption of code spelling out interior building, safety standard requirements

Property owners in Kent — whether of rentals or owner-occupied houses — will soon have a new set of rules to follow for interior building and safety standards.

voted Wednesday night to adopt the interior code section of the International Code Council's International Property Maintenance Code. The code "provides requirements for continued use and maintenance of plumbing, mechanical, electrical and fire protection systems in existing residential ... structures," according to the ICC website.

Bridget Susel, acting director of the , said the city has no laws or regulations to force landlords to make repairs if a house has interior problems that make unfit for habitation, such as a leaking roof, faulty plumbing or failing appliances.

"Instead of viewing this as … a heavy handed invastion of personal liberties, it really is nothing more than securing safe property," Susel said. "The perception is that if this code is adopted, we will be able to go into a house and cite without cause. Civil liberties (are) not going to be suspended under this. We still have to be invited in."

Susel was among several city department heads who testified before council Wednesday about the code, including the heads of the health, building and fire departments.

Robert Nitzsche, Kent's chief building official, told council members that he commonly sees life-threatening issues inside houses but can't cite the owner because Kent has no code to cite them under.

"When I send somebody out or I myself go out, I am hamstringed," Nitzsche said. "There are certain things I can’t do."

Recently, the city adopted the exterior portion of the ICC property maintenance code, but at the time council members voted not to adopt the interior section.

Through the health department, Kent licenses multi-use residential structures that have two or more unrelated people living in them. Under the licensing program, health officials conduct annual inspections based on the city's environmental health and housing maintenance code.

But Kent Health Commissioner Jeff Niestadt said the license inspection only addresses basic health and safety standards.

"Which is in my opinion very minimum standards," he said. "We’re talking light switches, tiles, pipes not dripping when you run the water. We’re not really addressing the structural integrity of the houses."

Nitzsche said those inspections typically won't catch building issues such as an improperly installed hot water tank or furnace, either of which could lead to serious safety problems.

"You have to remember, the health department are santiarians," Nitzsche said. "They have a different outlook than we do."

Susel gave one example of a house that was condemned by the city after the five tenants, some of whom are students at , called to complain that their landlord was not fixing problems in the house.

She said the house, at 305 University Drive, had been improperly excavated around the foundation without filing for a permit with the city. The excavation left the main gas line into the house and the gas meter hanging in mid air. Building officials found improperly installed gas lines, collapsed ceilings, a non-functioning smoke detector and an improperly wired fuse box.

Chris Binkley, one of the students who lived in the house, said they gave the landlord a list of problems they identified when they first moved in that included leaking ceilings.

"He assured us it would be taken care of within a month," he said. “Nothing was ever fixed. We actually couldn’t be in one of the bedrooms and the living room during or after storms because the water would leak through."

Eventually, Binkley and his roommates were evicted by the landlord in November after trying to withhold their rent to force the repairs.

The house was licensed in 2011 with the health department by Vincent DeGeorge, according to health department records. The property is owned by A & H Investments Join Venture LLC, according to Portage County Auditor's Office online records. The owner has a Sagamore Hills address.

Greg Jarvie, vice president for enrollment management at Kent State, said such cases are why the university supported adoption of the interior maintenance code.

"I know this can be an enforcement issue," Jarvie said. "If there’s anything we can do to help we’ll be more than happy to assist in any way we can.”

Councilman Wayne Wilson cast the only vote against adopting the code in Wednesday's committee meeting. The issue will return to council later this month for a final vote.

The code would apply to both rental properties and owner-occupied houses.

Councilman Jack Amrhein said landlords have a responsibility to provide safe housing for their tenants.

"If someone feels that some civil rights are being violated because they don’t want (inspectors) entering their property, what about a renter’s civil rights to live in a safe dwelling," Amrhein said.

G Myers March 8, 2012 at 07:08 pm
Thank you for writing the whole story Mr. Fredmonsky! When my father and I read the completely biased report that was on the front page of the Record Courier, we were led to believe that the new regulations were to be only for landlords in the City of Kent, not that everyone would be included. Shame on you Kyle McDonald for a horribly slanted article! As for the student you quoted in your article, my questions to that student are "why did you continue living there after the first month? Did you ever call the city? or the department of health? did you attempt to find other housing instead of living in unsafe conditions? did you stay there because the rent was low?" This article is just an awful example of "sensational journalism" instead of factual reporting of who falls under the scope of the new code. And lastly, shame on the editor for allowing this article to be printed!
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) March 8, 2012 at 10:45 pm
You're welcome. Last night, council briefly (I emphasize the word "briefly") discussed the idea of limiting enforcement of the interior code to rental properties only. But council members decided that would be unfair, so the code as it was discussed last night would apply to rental and owner-occupied properties. As for the student who testified, they kept trying to work it out with their landlord before they finally called the city to get involved.
Kasha Legeza March 9, 2012 at 06:12 am
I'm really happy city officials are pursuing this ... I've heard many rental horror stories over the years. I'm not surprised no one is complaining about this because who can say they're opposed to safe, decent housing?
Sonia Gwynes March 9, 2012 at 03:34 pm
Matt, thank you for publishing this article. The Record Courier's front page article was incomplete and reading it lead me to believe only rentals would be affected. Thank you.
Chris (Kit) Myers March 9, 2012 at 08:38 pm
I think it needs to be read before people jump on the bandwagon. I understand it's available at Wal-Mart. I will pick up a copy.
Students need to make sure that houses are licensed before renting. KSU's Mr. Jarvie apparently has never heard any of the "horror stories" about kids waiting weeks before things are repaired in their dorm rooms.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) March 9, 2012 at 09:44 pm
I did not quote Mr. Jarvie extensively, but he told council he's heard the same horror stories over and over, hence his support for adopting the code.
Chris (Kit) Myers March 10, 2012 at 02:08 pm
Matt, do you know whether or not the City will be required to advise the property owner of an alleged problem prior to sending an authority to the residence? Would dorm residents with "horror stories" fall under the health and safety umbrella?
Sonia Gwynes March 10, 2012 at 03:52 pm
Chris, this is all I could find in the proposed code. Under CHAPTER 1403
DUTIES AND POWERS: "The Community Development Director, shall have the authority as necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, to adopt and promulgate rules and procedures relative to enforcement; to interpret and implement the provisions of this code; to secure the intent thereof; and to modify applicable requirements due to the local climate or other unusual conditions. Such rules shall not have the effect of waiving any requirement of this ordinance or of compromising public safety." "The Code Official is authorized to enter the structure or premises at reasonable times to inspect subject to constitutional restrictions on unreasonable searches and seizures. If entry is refused or not obtained, the Code Official is authorized to pursue recourse as provided by law. (a.) Identification - The Code Official shall carry proper identification when inspecting structures or premises in the performance of duties under this code." Here's the link to the whole ball of wax: http://www.kentohio.org/dep/KENTIPMC2006.pdf
Chris (Kit) Myers March 10, 2012 at 11:11 pm
Thanks, Sonia.
As I read the patch article, it seems that a tenant or even the child of a homeowner can invite the inspector in after he/she alleges to the city that there is a dwelling problem that falls under the code. This appears contrary to the notification section of what's in the link you sent me. The International Code has been updated since 2006. I found it by Yahooing: Text of International Building Maintenance Code and opening the site publiccodes.citation.com. Go to the KSU Chorale spring concert this Sunday at 4:00 at the Presbyterian Church. Only ten bucks. A deal!
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) March 12, 2012 at 08:54 pm
If you click on the link in the article it will take you to the latest version, which is dated 2012, of the ICC code. But I believe you have to buy a copy to get the full version.
Sonia Gwynes March 12, 2012 at 11:09 pm
Matt, thank you again.
Chris (Kit) Myers March 12, 2012 at 11:39 pm
Thanks, Matt. You and the Kent Stater are the best media in Kent. The R-C has, unless I have missed it, failed to state that the proposed legislation also applies to private homes.
I have lived in Kent since 1936 and am all for decent housing for everybody. It is my town. There are landlords everywhere that are only interested in signing a lease and collecting the rent, and, being a landlord myself, I hold them in great disdain. But I am NOT in favor of legislation driven by unverified heresay or "horror stories." There are two sides to every story. The bottom line is, don't sign a lease for a house that has obvious long-standing problems. If nobody did, the owner would soon go out of business. I wish I were in a position to advise students what to look for, but I doubt if the university would let me on campus to do so. I sneak into the music and speech building to attend recitals and concerts! There is a concert in the recital hall (Ludwig Auditorium) this Friday at 3:00. The music students are magnificent. Just thought I'd pass this along to those who are unaware of some of the cultural opportunities available free to the public at Kent State. Chris
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) March 12, 2012 at 11:54 pm
Chris, I believe you're right on several counts, my two favorite being: the magnificent quality of Kent State's music students; and the "advice" students should take before signing a lease.
Fred Garvin May 23, 2012 at 01:08 pm
This it how it starts, more goverment control over us. First people have to INVITE the authorities in, then a few years later they gradually change the law to mandate inspections of all properties. Eventually they will be inspecting ALL properties under the guise of "It's all for the public's safety". Just another way to increase the flow of money to the government and less freedom for the people.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kent Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Chris (Kit) Myers June 19, 2013 at 09:20 am
Yeah, it's tough having to cross railroad tracks on a bike trail provided by the taxpayers for youRead More to use free of charge. I feel your pain...
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 01:25 pm
Thanks for the information Gary. Last I was told we can expect it to open this summer.
Mary June 19, 2013 at 05:42 pm
It's looking good. I can't wait!
Linda Davis, founder of Loved Ones of Prisoners, a support group for families.
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Linda, Kudos! Tough subject to not only approach but create a whole support group. I'm going toRead More pass judgement and say I think you are great!
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Paula, While I believe there are truly good people out there who have nothing but the bestRead More intentions for others, this story does not shock nor surprise me. I attended meetings with a friend who was court ordered. They couldn't drive and I figured I would sit with them instead of driving back and forth. AA claims not to be a religious sect but all the meetings and steps center around God. Not that I have a problem with God, but some people don't believe. Our courts (Judges) sentence people to attend meetings for DUI. I find this sad and irresponsible. One, it's religion. Two, you are sending alcoholics in to a group of other alcoholics who are not trained to help people with addiction. AA teaches people they are "helpless and powerless". Really? An individual has to find strength from within to fight the addiction. Telling people they are helpless isn't going to help. Alcoholism is usually tied to mental issues or illness. Going into a room and listening to other people's depressing rock bottom stories made me want to leave and go drink. Paradise Club....... hmmmmmmm...... I am not surprised. The only reason these court ordered sessions continue is that it doesn't cost the court any money. DUI's are a money maker for the courts, police and all the attorney's out there. Ah, but that's another story. I hope there is a happy ending for all of those above and others like them who have suffered under the guise of AA.
Amber Rodriguez June 13, 2013 at 12:30 am
I just want to let people know that Dandelion has been found, thank all of you who expressed concernRead More and kept your eyes out for him.
Michelle Fredmonsky-Harvey June 19, 2013 at 10:30 am
SO HAPPY to hear that !!!! :)
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Does this not qualify? We're also the only news agency to report if he actually had an explosiveRead More device on him or not. Stories similar to what you've asked for almost all appeared last week. http://kent.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/man-arrested-after-threatening-to-set-off-bomb-at-kent-state_593fe0c4
Dave June 5, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Maybe it is just the start to a slow summer or a sign that there is nothing interesting going on inRead More Kent. The story you mentioned turned out to be pretty uneventful and more about a guy making false, not real, threats. The two stories that have seen the most face-time have been KRHS's valedictorian and the med helicopter. Maybe highlight achievements and products of local businesses we don't hear about. Run an interesting historical piece. Not trying to be argumentative but rather making a comment that the information provided as of late has been less than interesting.
amelfo June 7, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Matt -- no need to defend yourself. Considerate of you to respond, though.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 05:12 pm
It seems hardly anyone ever waits until the end of the procession to congratulate all the graduatesRead More at once.
lost cat is on the left in the photo
Patricia June 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I posted it to FB too, I live on Wolcott and I saw the flyer yesterday on a pole.
janetstavole June 4, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to everyone who is helping and has helped. Emmie is still missing but it helps to know soRead More many are looking out for her and us. Thanks again! Janet Stavole
janetstavole June 5, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Happy to report my cat was found....in a friends garage across 43 and about one quarter of a mileRead More away. Thanks to all of you who reposted our information on Facebook. Janet Stavole
Sue May 8, 2013 at 01:47 am
The school levy has passed. This is great news for the children of Kent. Thanks to everyone whoRead More voted for the levy.
Jim Williams May 8, 2013 at 02:05 am
Glad to see that 17% of Kent citizens were able to muster the energy to bother voting, and that theRead More majority of those few supported this very important issue. Congrats to the District for making the convincing argument. It's pretty clear that the chorus of "NO" that exists here on Patch is not representative of the majority.
Concerned Citizen May 8, 2013 at 02:58 am
Good voting LD
Teresa K. April 25, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I'm glad the League did their research. Have they ever researched and said: "no, we dont feelRead More the levy is needed?" For most of us, our research need only go as far as our wallets and income. If the schools with their million dollar budgets are feeling the crunch, imagine how average or lower average income homes are struggling. I am very suspect of the excellent w/ distincton rating and the asking of this levy at this time. How were we able to get that kind of incredible rating with NO ADDED FUNDS? Did the teachers wake up last year? Did the kids wake up? How did the school get such superior ratings THAT year and none in previous ones? why such a huge gap in time and ratings? The days of passing every school levy "just because", "we've never said no", "for the kids" or to keep our "property values" are over. The economy took care of that. No matter how you feel about the levy: PLEASE VOTE.
Sa;;y April 25, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I urge my fellow residents to send a message to the school board: The Board needs to face the factRead More of the current economic conditions involving the residents in the Kent city school district and come back with a request for a more reasonable millage. Otherwise, I think the levy will fail. Our city leaders encouraged businesses to come into the new development by granting concessions on taxes. Well, there goes the additional money!
Sue May 7, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Vote YES today for Kent children. Yes on the school levy.