.
Feedback

Downtown Food Vendors Relocated to Franklin Avenue

Council approves moving temporary vendor locations to beneath the Haymaker Parkway overpass

Mobile food vendors who set up shop in the evenings in downtown Kent are going to lose their prime spots starting in 2013.

Kent City Council voted this week to relocate the designated locations for vendors with the category A license from five spots spread throughout downtown to one location on Franklin Avenue beneath the Haymaker Parkway overpass.

Kent Law Director Jim Silver said city officials started to consider relocating the category A vendors after problems with towing cars from designated vending spots, such as the space near the intersection of Main and Water streets in the middle of downtown.

"Issues began as soon as we actually had vendors start setting up downtown," Silver said. "Vendors would show, the parking spaces designated with a sign and paint were occupied, and we would have to tow vehicles from downtown. We don’t like towing cars … so that was a problem."

Council also voted to amend its street vending program to allow up to five designated spaces, but city officials plan to only issue three category A licenses for 2013.

The program started in January 2011 in an attempt to regulate the food vendors, who had started to compete for prime spaces outside Kent's bars.

The new location is in the space on the western side of Franklin Avenue, directly beneath the bridge, in an area that is not currently designated as parking spaces. Vendors' windows would face west to keep lines from forming in the street.

Kent City Manager Dave Ruller said one issue with the program has been with vendors occupying parking downtown in high-demand areas.

"Now we have all these restaurants and new eating establishments as well as the existing ones, (and) the desire to see the street vending may be less in terms of the prime locations when we started all this," he said. "We're pretty much moving them off that front and center stage and putting them on a side stage."

Councilman Garret Ferrara said he liked the idea of creating a cluster spot for the vendors.

"I think it’s a worthwhile endeavor to try," he said.

But Councilwoman Heidi Shaffer said she was somewhat concerned about the effect the location might have on the Haymaker Farmers Market, which sets up beneath the bridge during the warmer months.

"The Haymaker Farmers Market shouldn't have to clean up after a bunch of vendors," she said. "I have a strong loyalty to the bricks and mortar businesses. I don’t want to put anybody out of business that has been a vendor in Kent. So that’s my struggle. If it disturbs the neighborhood and affects bricks and mortar businesses, I will certainly want to take another look at this."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kent Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Donald S December 10, 2012 at 06:20 am
Wow, might as well tell them to pack it up and not bother coming out at all. So the city got tired of doing their jobs in the case of towing cars. How hard is it to call those hillbillies at bakers or city towing and tell them to grab a certain car?
Now Dave Ruler said parking is an issue downtown? The city's brochure about downtown proudly boasts well over 1000 FREE parking spots already downtown without the parking deck. You're telling me a few spots are a huge issue? What about this brand new parking deck and big lot behind Davey Tree for? Something sounds extremely fishy here.
Wilburforce December 10, 2012 at 12:07 pm
Move the Vendors up next to Wendy's across from KSU.....there's a nice vacant lot there.
Just wishful thinking ......
Char December 10, 2012 at 01:57 pm
Give them 5 slots on Erie between Franklin and Water...make downtown walkable and with options outside as well as in. We certainly can do w/out 5 spots there, especially with all the new parking! Move them to under the bridge...agree may as well tell them to not come!
Teresa K. December 10, 2012 at 02:01 pm
This is nice and orderly. We can contain the vendors to the spot UNDER THE BRIDGE and the students will be contained with the one walkway to downtown. Everyone will have their own designated place to be and it will be easier to police the city too. ( yes, Im being sarcastic)
Mr. Ruller said: "We're pretty much moving them off that front and center stage and putting them on a side stage." Sounds pretty. I'm hearing this: we're taking them out of the visual field, won't let them compete with newer food outlets, sticking them under the BRIDGE, and facing them all west. who was the genius that thought of facing them all west? Reminds me of the Seinfeld episode with the soup nazi. Wasn't the point of them being front and center stage CUSTOMER traffic?
i love doughnuts December 10, 2012 at 02:20 pm
shady move by council who, no doubt, are being rubbed by the local businesses who are hoping hungry drunks would rather have a bad hot dog in acorn alley or a warm cookie than walk out-of-their way for something better. unfortunately, this will kill the food carts as there are no businesses surrounding that bridge and very little pedestrian traffic. just when i thought i couldn't detest this council any more...
Mary December 10, 2012 at 03:04 pm
What is wrong with this city? AH!
Chip Souza December 10, 2012 at 03:07 pm
instead of complaining, why not contribute some positive ideas to resolve the matter? it's not very courageous to hide behind anonymous rants. if you detest the city so much, then move out. moving the vendors down franklin ave. may not be the best idea, but at the least, the city is indeed addressing the issue. if you have a better solution, then, speak up. Just sayin. I agree that moving them down to the bridge is a terrible idea for the vendors & the public. once it gets cold, who's going to walk down to the bridge for a gyro? perhaps the businesses on the top of the East Main hill (firestone & main st auto) would be happy to rent out spaces in their parking lots? Move them closer to a majority of their patrons: walking students!
Bethany Tipton Snyder December 10, 2012 at 03:22 pm
I think it's a terrible idea to move them all to one place.
1) Their business will surely suffer. And even though they don't have a front door per se they still count. Their livelihood still depends on their success. 2) I'm not sure how smart it is to invite all the drunk people to one place at 2:30 am. Especially a place that is dark and somewhat hidden from view. I think we are inviting trouble. 3) The vendors are a part of an active street life. Why would we want to diminish that?
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) December 10, 2012 at 03:45 pm
For what it's worth, Chip is correct. The vendors can set up anywhere they can reach an agreement with a private property owner to do so. For example, the parking lot or entrance to a business that is typically closed on weekend nights.
Tiffany Jones December 10, 2012 at 04:36 pm
That is a great idea! Hopefully the vendors in question read the Kent patch!
Matthias P. December 10, 2012 at 04:46 pm
I have never purchased food from the street vendors in Kent, however, putting them next to the homeless people under Haymaker Parkway? Why doesn't the city just ban the vendors completely if they don't want them around?
William Gibson December 10, 2012 at 04:56 pm
I rarely see anyone eat at the street vendors anyway. I think those prime spots are more appropriate for customers spending money at the businesses that pay rent and have made a real commitment to Kent consumers. Besides this ought to eliminate the Dawgfather's sense of entitlement to both the spots across from the Loft instead of just the one spot that is actually marked.
Donald S December 10, 2012 at 09:55 pm
Chip, this is nothing more than Ruller moving these venders in hopes people eat and visit these brand new buildings they just spent a ton of money on that could fail according to Dave Ruller. Heres a better solution, keep everything as is, 4 or 5 spots is NOT harming anything downtown in these evening hours. It is nice of Dave Ruller to kick out a local kent guy like Dawgfather. I am so sick of this council
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Linda Davis, founder of Loved Ones of Prisoners, a support group for families.
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Linda, Kudos! Tough subject to not only approach but create a whole support group. I'm going toRead More pass judgement and say I think you are great!
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Paula, While I believe there are truly good people out there who have nothing but the bestRead More intentions for others, this story does not shock nor surprise me. I attended meetings with a friend who was court ordered. They couldn't drive and I figured I would sit with them instead of driving back and forth. AA claims not to be a religious sect but all the meetings and steps center around God. Not that I have a problem with God, but some people don't believe. Our courts (Judges) sentence people to attend meetings for DUI. I find this sad and irresponsible. One, it's religion. Two, you are sending alcoholics in to a group of other alcoholics who are not trained to help people with addiction. AA teaches people they are "helpless and powerless". Really? An individual has to find strength from within to fight the addiction. Telling people they are helpless isn't going to help. Alcoholism is usually tied to mental issues or illness. Going into a room and listening to other people's depressing rock bottom stories made me want to leave and go drink. Paradise Club....... hmmmmmmm...... I am not surprised. The only reason these court ordered sessions continue is that it doesn't cost the court any money. DUI's are a money maker for the courts, police and all the attorney's out there. Ah, but that's another story. I hope there is a happy ending for all of those above and others like them who have suffered under the guise of AA.
Amber Rodriguez June 13, 2013 at 12:30 am
I just want to let people know that Dandelion has been found, thank all of you who expressed concernRead More and kept your eyes out for him.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Does this not qualify? We're also the only news agency to report if he actually had an explosiveRead More device on him or not. Stories similar to what you've asked for almost all appeared last week. http://kent.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/man-arrested-after-threatening-to-set-off-bomb-at-kent-state_593fe0c4
Dave June 5, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Maybe it is just the start to a slow summer or a sign that there is nothing interesting going on inRead More Kent. The story you mentioned turned out to be pretty uneventful and more about a guy making false, not real, threats. The two stories that have seen the most face-time have been KRHS's valedictorian and the med helicopter. Maybe highlight achievements and products of local businesses we don't hear about. Run an interesting historical piece. Not trying to be argumentative but rather making a comment that the information provided as of late has been less than interesting.
amelfo June 7, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Matt -- no need to defend yourself. Considerate of you to respond, though.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 05:12 pm
It seems hardly anyone ever waits until the end of the procession to congratulate all the graduatesRead More at once.
lost cat is on the left in the photo
Patricia June 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I posted it to FB too, I live on Wolcott and I saw the flyer yesterday on a pole.
janetstavole June 4, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to everyone who is helping and has helped. Emmie is still missing but it helps to know soRead More many are looking out for her and us. Thanks again! Janet Stavole
janetstavole June 5, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Happy to report my cat was found....in a friends garage across 43 and about one quarter of a mileRead More away. Thanks to all of you who reposted our information on Facebook. Janet Stavole
Sue May 8, 2013 at 01:47 am
The school levy has passed. This is great news for the children of Kent. Thanks to everyone whoRead More voted for the levy.
Jim Williams May 8, 2013 at 02:05 am
Glad to see that 17% of Kent citizens were able to muster the energy to bother voting, and that theRead More majority of those few supported this very important issue. Congrats to the District for making the convincing argument. It's pretty clear that the chorus of "NO" that exists here on Patch is not representative of the majority.
Concerned Citizen May 8, 2013 at 02:58 am
Good voting LD
Teresa K. April 25, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I'm glad the League did their research. Have they ever researched and said: "no, we dont feelRead More the levy is needed?" For most of us, our research need only go as far as our wallets and income. If the schools with their million dollar budgets are feeling the crunch, imagine how average or lower average income homes are struggling. I am very suspect of the excellent w/ distincton rating and the asking of this levy at this time. How were we able to get that kind of incredible rating with NO ADDED FUNDS? Did the teachers wake up last year? Did the kids wake up? How did the school get such superior ratings THAT year and none in previous ones? why such a huge gap in time and ratings? The days of passing every school levy "just because", "we've never said no", "for the kids" or to keep our "property values" are over. The economy took care of that. No matter how you feel about the levy: PLEASE VOTE.
Sa;;y April 25, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I urge my fellow residents to send a message to the school board: The Board needs to face the factRead More of the current economic conditions involving the residents in the Kent city school district and come back with a request for a more reasonable millage. Otherwise, I think the levy will fail. Our city leaders encouraged businesses to come into the new development by granting concessions on taxes. Well, there goes the additional money!
Sue May 7, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Vote YES today for Kent children. Yes on the school levy.