Anti-Fracking Group asks City for Law Banning Controversial Drilling Practice

Kent City Council to discuss proposed ordinance banning fracking at April 4 meeting

After 30 minutes of stating their case, supporters of an anti-fracking law in Kent got their wish partly fulfilled Wednesday night. 

Supporters of a ban on fracking asked members to consider establishing an ordinance banning the controversial method of drilling for natural gas within city limits.

Council members listened to 30 minutes of testimony from residents who support the ban before Kent Mayor Jerry Fiala asked if anyone on council wanted to consider making a motion on the issue.

Councilwoman Tracy Wallach moved to put the issue — and the proposed draft ordinance — on the agenda for council's April 4 committee meeting. Council voted unanimously to put the issue on next week's agenda.

Fiala said he asked for the motion in order to expedite the group's request.

More than 20 people signed up to speak to council Wednesday night but only 10 spoke about the fracking issue before council voted to refer it to next week's committee meeting. No one spoke in favor of the practice, which has been widely implemented in the gas drilling industry and has been scrutinized for its potentially harmful after effects.

Those who spoke included The Rev. Melissa Carvill-Zeimer, who compared a few millileters of water in a syringe taken from a 2 quart container of water to the amount of clean, usable water available on the earth's surface.

"The amount of fresh water accessible to us is a tiny percentage of the water covering the surface of the earth," Carvill-Zeimer said. She said permitting fracking in Kent would lead to the contamination of Kent's drinking water, which has been internationally recognized for its high quality.

Others who spoke used the same example of potentially contaminating Kent's water supply — which is drawn from underground acquifers near the Village of Brady Lake — as a reason for council to ban the practice, including Caroline Arnold.

Arnold, a longtime Kent resident and founding member of the Kent Environmental Council, urged the city council to follow suit with past incarnations of the Tree City's top governing body and take a pro-environmental stance.

"One of Kent’s outstanding features over the years has been its excellent water,” Arnold said. “I am concerned today because our community’s authority to control actions that may effect our water, air and soil has been taken away from us so that oil companies can ... extract natural gas and sell it on the world markets."

Kent Assistant Law Director Eric Fink told council members the power to enact laws regarding fracking is reserved for state legislative bodies.

Supporters of the ban, however, argued other municipalities in Ohio have taken action to ban fracking and suggested Kent could do the same.

After supporters of the ban left the meeting, council discussed the idea of bringing in representatives from the oil and gas drilling industry to talk about the drilling method at next week's committee meeting.

"I think it’s only fair that we make some type of an effort to find somebody on the other side," Councilman John Kuhar said.

But after some discussion council voted not to make an effort to invite industry members in for the meeting and instead opted to rely on news coverage of the upcoming meeting as a means of encouraging fracking supporters to attend.

"It was very well known the anti-fracking group was coming to council," Councilman Jack Amrhein said, referring to local news coverage of the issue. "Anyone who is pro fracking could have said ‘I’m going to provide my side.’”

Council will discuss the issue again, and the proposed ordinance, during a committee meeting at 7 p.m. April 4.

David Badagnani March 30, 2012 at 12:23 PM
All fracking wells permeate groundwater. And all well "casing" materials will eventually corrode. Whether this happens in 20, 50, or 100 years it's still unacceptable, whether the contamination of our precious water supply happens during our lifetime or our descendants'. Further, each fracking well uses up to a million or millions of gallons of fresh water, which is then contaminated with fracking chemicals, as well as with toxic (and often also radioactive) materials that come up with the used fluid. So, yes, hundreds of thousands to millions of gallons of water *per well* are always contaminated, in addition to the eventual contamination of the actual aquifers and groundwater when the well casings eventually corrode and disintegrate, or if they are not constructed properly in the first place.
Black Squirrel March 30, 2012 at 07:33 PM
I'm all for protecting groundwater but I think that many people are being alarmists simply because this is new to us. Fear is natural because what's going on is essentially unknown to us. However, to state that all fracking leads to water contamination is ludicrous. It's simply not true. I'm sure that these big oil companies intentions are not to come in to every town in Ohio and pollute water. They're employees are drinking it too. I think we all just need to take a deep breath and look around. A number of wells have been drilled in Ohio in the last year or so and I haven't heard any reports about water contamination. I'm all for protecting our water but I'm also for having Ohio help to rescue this country from its dependence on foreign oil.
ARBY March 30, 2012 at 11:46 PM
Black Squirrel - Former New York environmental engineering technician: "Hydraulic fracturing as it’s practiced today will contaminate our aquifers. Not might contaminate our aquifers. Hydraulic fracturing will contaminate New York’s aquifers. If you were looking for a way to poison the drinking water supply, here in the Northeast you couldn’t find a more chillingly effective and thorough method of doing so than with hydraulic fracturing. My experience investigating and remediating contaminated groundwater taught me some lessons. There’s no such thing as a perfect well seal. Occasionally sooner, often later, well seals can and do fail, period.”
Clean Water Lover April 01, 2012 at 04:32 PM
Lived where fracking was used in North Hampton / now Cuyahoga Falls. I was a tenant on a farm, drinking good well water. The owner drilled two wells that were fracked. The well water was undrinkable after that. This is why North Hampton was "absorbed" by Cuyahoga Falls, so the residence could get water piped in from Cuyhoga Falls. Kent & Portage County get water from wells. Do you want to be forced to buy water from the City of Akron when our wells go bad from fracking? Akron will be most glad to sell water from their reservoirs in Portage County back to us.... how ironic... wake up people !!! Clean Water Lover.
Simon August 01, 2012 at 03:00 AM
I believe that the city should not put its water source at risk. Since Kent is known for its high quality water, for the city's reputation and the health of its residents sakes, the process of fracking should be banned. If no one opposes the ban, what are they waiting for? - http://www.starrausten.com


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »