.
Feedback

Nuisance Party Arrest on University Drive

Arrest marks at least third for nuisance party on street since classes resumed at Kent State

A third Kent State University student has been charged in connection with a nuisance party on University Drive since classes resumed for the fall semester.

Kent Police charged MacKenzie M. Mitchell, 19, of 840 Morris Road, with failure to disperse from a nuisance party, an unclassified misdemeanor, early Sunday morning.

Officers were breaking up a nuisance party at 125 University Drive shortly after 1 a.m. Sunday when Mitchell refused to leave and was charged, according to police.

The psychology student at Kent State is the third student to be arrested on University Drive this semester in relation to a loud party.

In September, police arrested Nicholas S. Elder, 19, of 222 University Drive, and charged him with holding a nuisance party, which also is an unclassified misdemeanor. The Pennsylvania native is a sophomore at Kent State University.

And in August police shut down a nuisance party at 206 University Drive and charged a tenant of that house, also a Kent State student, with a nuisance party violation.

Nuisance party violations across the city are up in 2012 compared with the previous two years, KentWired reported Tuesday.

So far 63 nuisance parties have been reported this year compared with 14 in 2011 and 34 in 2010, according to KentWired.

Kent Police Lt. Jim Prusha told KentWired the department is more strictly adhering to the nuisance party law.

"In the past, officers have been a little more lenient than what our procedure actually says they should be … it kind of got a little lax,” Prusha told KentWired. “It’s really a no-nonsense kind of thing. If you go there, and this is what’s happening, it’s a ticket.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kent Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Teresa K. November 14, 2012 at 02:30 pm
This doesnt make sense to me! Nuisance parties are up in numbers, high numbers too, this year and YET... the college has chosen a "smarter" group of students. KSU was being very selective and getting a higher "quality" of students.
Why were police so lax before? What changed?
Donald S November 14, 2012 at 02:44 pm
partying has nothing to do with how intelligent you are teresa....
Teresa K. November 14, 2012 at 03:03 pm
donald: OH! ok ; )
I'm all for parties for the students. But a nuisance party is different.
Sarah Skibiski November 14, 2012 at 03:06 pm
It's a college town, what do people expect?
Sarah Skibiski November 14, 2012 at 03:10 pm
Possibly because they need more fine money?
http://kent.patch.com/articles/city-manager-2013-budget-frustrating
Artie November 14, 2012 at 03:13 pm
Are you really surprised? The university conveniently tossed students off campus; bought the frat houses on Lincoln to be demolished, demolished Allerton housing. See a pattern? Put the students out into the Kent neighborhoods and the University is no longer responsible for them, let Kent City police deal with the students now.
Chris (Kit) Myers November 14, 2012 at 03:44 pm
Ah, ain't alcohol grand?
Teresa K. November 14, 2012 at 05:47 pm
@sarah: I expect parties !!! par for the course every weekend or holiday.
Nuisances must be contained though. I'm not sure what qualifies as a nuisance party though?
Teresa K. November 14, 2012 at 05:49 pm
@chris: it sure is. cheers!
Jason Mason November 14, 2012 at 07:47 pm
The cops are lashing out because they didn't get their new sty/jail when they lost in the election. They want to keep up with the judges that are building a new courthouse and they are jealous! They had to buy a sump pump for their leaky basement at the ReStore!
Chris (Kit) Myers November 14, 2012 at 08:40 pm
Lashing out? No, they are doing what we taxpayers expect; fighting a constant battle against what seem to be incredible odds in order to maintain the peaceful enjoyment of the neighborhoods for those who would like Kent to be a fine city in which to live, work, and raise a family. Perhaps someday you will understand.
Sarah Skibiski November 15, 2012 at 12:19 pm
I'd be interested in knowing what exactly a nuisance party is as compared to a normal party too.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) November 15, 2012 at 04:25 pm
Sarah, a nuisance party is defined under section 509.13 of the city's codified ordinances as "a social gathering or party" that meets any number of 10 criteria, including:
Illegal open container Littering Outdoor urination or defecation in a public place or on another's property The ordinance makes both property owners and tenants responsible for preventing such instances.
Super citizen November 16, 2012 at 04:13 am
Its nice to see the KPD not let this party get out of control like they usually do
Super citizen November 16, 2012 at 04:14 am
Well said Jason! It took a failed levy to wake the KPD up
Super citizen November 16, 2012 at 04:18 am
Easy there KIT. The KPD usually waits till the party gets out of hand before they do anything about it. The same thing happens every year, at the same time. Every May, they put 2 officers at the end of the street for the parties in MAy. When it get out of control, they call the other police depts to come help. Just think what Jason is saying, its nice to see the KPD finally do something
Super citizen November 16, 2012 at 04:22 am
A party for me, might be a nuisance to others, or visa versa. Its about preception. No matter what kind of party it it, its a problem only when busted
Chris (Kit) Myers November 17, 2012 at 02:32 pm
Parties do not get out of control; people do.
Police presense should not be required before or when a party begins. It seems that that is what is necessary in Kent. Would the law-breakers act the same way on the block in front of their parents' home? I seriously doubt it. Why do it in Kent?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Linda Davis, founder of Loved Ones of Prisoners, a support group for families.
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Linda, Kudos! Tough subject to not only approach but create a whole support group. I'm going toRead More pass judgement and say I think you are great!
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Paula, While I believe there are truly good people out there who have nothing but the bestRead More intentions for others, this story does not shock nor surprise me. I attended meetings with a friend who was court ordered. They couldn't drive and I figured I would sit with them instead of driving back and forth. AA claims not to be a religious sect but all the meetings and steps center around God. Not that I have a problem with God, but some people don't believe. Our courts (Judges) sentence people to attend meetings for DUI. I find this sad and irresponsible. One, it's religion. Two, you are sending alcoholics in to a group of other alcoholics who are not trained to help people with addiction. AA teaches people they are "helpless and powerless". Really? An individual has to find strength from within to fight the addiction. Telling people they are helpless isn't going to help. Alcoholism is usually tied to mental issues or illness. Going into a room and listening to other people's depressing rock bottom stories made me want to leave and go drink. Paradise Club....... hmmmmmmm...... I am not surprised. The only reason these court ordered sessions continue is that it doesn't cost the court any money. DUI's are a money maker for the courts, police and all the attorney's out there. Ah, but that's another story. I hope there is a happy ending for all of those above and others like them who have suffered under the guise of AA.
Amber Rodriguez June 13, 2013 at 12:30 am
I just want to let people know that Dandelion has been found, thank all of you who expressed concernRead More and kept your eyes out for him.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Does this not qualify? We're also the only news agency to report if he actually had an explosiveRead More device on him or not. Stories similar to what you've asked for almost all appeared last week. http://kent.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/man-arrested-after-threatening-to-set-off-bomb-at-kent-state_593fe0c4
Dave June 5, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Maybe it is just the start to a slow summer or a sign that there is nothing interesting going on inRead More Kent. The story you mentioned turned out to be pretty uneventful and more about a guy making false, not real, threats. The two stories that have seen the most face-time have been KRHS's valedictorian and the med helicopter. Maybe highlight achievements and products of local businesses we don't hear about. Run an interesting historical piece. Not trying to be argumentative but rather making a comment that the information provided as of late has been less than interesting.
amelfo June 7, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Matt -- no need to defend yourself. Considerate of you to respond, though.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 05:12 pm
It seems hardly anyone ever waits until the end of the procession to congratulate all the graduatesRead More at once.
lost cat is on the left in the photo
Patricia June 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I posted it to FB too, I live on Wolcott and I saw the flyer yesterday on a pole.
janetstavole June 4, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to everyone who is helping and has helped. Emmie is still missing but it helps to know soRead More many are looking out for her and us. Thanks again! Janet Stavole
janetstavole June 5, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Happy to report my cat was found....in a friends garage across 43 and about one quarter of a mileRead More away. Thanks to all of you who reposted our information on Facebook. Janet Stavole
Sue May 8, 2013 at 01:47 am
The school levy has passed. This is great news for the children of Kent. Thanks to everyone whoRead More voted for the levy.
Jim Williams May 8, 2013 at 02:05 am
Glad to see that 17% of Kent citizens were able to muster the energy to bother voting, and that theRead More majority of those few supported this very important issue. Congrats to the District for making the convincing argument. It's pretty clear that the chorus of "NO" that exists here on Patch is not representative of the majority.
Concerned Citizen May 8, 2013 at 02:58 am
Good voting LD
Teresa K. April 25, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I'm glad the League did their research. Have they ever researched and said: "no, we dont feelRead More the levy is needed?" For most of us, our research need only go as far as our wallets and income. If the schools with their million dollar budgets are feeling the crunch, imagine how average or lower average income homes are struggling. I am very suspect of the excellent w/ distincton rating and the asking of this levy at this time. How were we able to get that kind of incredible rating with NO ADDED FUNDS? Did the teachers wake up last year? Did the kids wake up? How did the school get such superior ratings THAT year and none in previous ones? why such a huge gap in time and ratings? The days of passing every school levy "just because", "we've never said no", "for the kids" or to keep our "property values" are over. The economy took care of that. No matter how you feel about the levy: PLEASE VOTE.
Sa;;y April 25, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I urge my fellow residents to send a message to the school board: The Board needs to face the factRead More of the current economic conditions involving the residents in the Kent city school district and come back with a request for a more reasonable millage. Otherwise, I think the levy will fail. Our city leaders encouraged businesses to come into the new development by granting concessions on taxes. Well, there goes the additional money!
Sue May 7, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Vote YES today for Kent children. Yes on the school levy.