.
Feedback

Standing Rock Director Opposes Wells-Sherman House Relocation

Jeff Ingram, director of Standing Rock Cultural Arts, wants greenspace next to art gallery preserved

It may be too late, but the director of Standing Rock Cultural Arts sent a letter to Kent City Council members this week expressing his opposition to the .

The Friends of the Wells-Sherman House are planning to relocate the building to the patch of greenspace between and the building on North Water Street.

The space, however, has been used by SRCA for programming and events for years.

Council voted last week to loan $15,000 to the relocation effort and will cast its final vote on the loan next week.

Ingram's letter to council, sent Tuesday, is below:

Greetings City Council,

Though I claim no ownership to the property at 247 North Water St, I’d like to contribute my two cents and convince the City of Kent that it’s resources are better off spent on preserving the Erie Street Depot (currently The Pufferbelly Restaurant) and the Marvin Kent House (currently the Masonic Lodge) than investing in The Wells Sherman House.

I am wondering if keeping it a green space would be more valuable to the City. If necessary, Standing Rock Cultural Arts can raise the money to purchase and maintain it as such.

If there is a good plan for this project, please answer the following questions:

What are the true costs of this project?

What will it cost to level the land and lay the foundation for the house?

What will it cost to tie in to the utilities and maintain them for perpetuity?

What parking is available to the tenants and visitors of this historic place?

What will it cost to renovate the structure to the point where it is recognized as a Historical Place by the State of Ohio?

Does The view this house as a priority for historic preservation?

What will it cost to maintain the property for ten years? For twenty years? For one hundred years?

What resources are committed to the project to insure success?

While the efforts of Rick Hawksley are laudable, and I’ve appreciated many of his contributions to the quality of life in Kent, including The Haymaker Farmer’s Market and The Portage Hike and Bike Trail, I feel this attempt to relocate the Wells Sherman House to the yard by The North Water Street Gallery is premature and poorly planned. It appears that moving it to this location is more of an act of desperation, rather than one of careful consideration that will result in a long lasting improvement to the neighborhood.

Let it be known that this land has been used for twenty years by Standing Rock Cultural Arts as a valuable Green Space. Through the years, we’ve built a rain garden to prevent soil erosion, erected solar panels, planted a garden which includes strawberries, raspberries, blueberries, basil, kale, beets, romaine lettuce, red oak leaf lettuce, parsley, collard greens, chives, tomatoes, jerusalem artichokes, onions, and garlic. There are cherry trees, an apple tree, and mulberry trees growing there as well. I am grateful to Jim Arthur for allowing us to use this space.

I have to question the motives of this project as well? What is this about The TransPortage organization, an organization based on the principles of sustainability, putting its office on top of one of the last green spaces in downtown Kent?

There are many groups including The New World Children’s Theatre, and The Annual Jawbone Poetry Reading, which use this space for making art, growing vegetables, holding pot lucks, reading poetry, and relaxing in a space that is close to downtown and an oasis of natural beauty.

After speaking with the Director of The Kent Historical Society, I am convinced that The Wells Sherman House is not a priority in terms of historic preservation in Kent. It will need a huge investment to renovate and maintain its integrity in perpetuity. What endowment is set up to insure that this house will be restored and maintained for the longterm? The director also mentioned that more energy should be put into preserving the Marvin Kent House and The Erie Street Depot.

To satisfy the property owners, if they are in need to sell this space, Standing Rock Cultural Arts would like to purchase the property and maintain it as green space and sculpture garden. We welcome the opportunity to raise funds for this purpose and feel we can accomplish this within a year. I will also personally assist in the search for another location for The Wells Sherman House.

I am saddened by many of the comments in favor of this project which never once acknowledge that there will be a great loss when this structure moves on to the green space. As for preservation, preserving green space in downtown Kent is what I consider valuable. There was a time when undeveloped land was considered useless. Now that there is so little green space left in our Downtown, it has become precious.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Jeff Ingram/Executive Director
Standing Rock Cultural Arts
257 N. Water St., Kent, Ohio

Jon Ridinger June 15, 2012 at 04:34 am
All the uses you describe are there at the grace of the property owner, who has decided he would like his property used for the relocation of this house. What was the agreement Standing Rock had with the property owner to use this lot? Did it specify such uses would remain in perpetuity? Doesn't sound like it. It's not like the property owner is being strong-armed into selling this either. For whatever reasons, it seems some in this city have come to believe that long-term rental or other long-term use is equal to assuming property ownership.
In all honesty, if Standing Rock requires a yard for their programming to be complete, I would highly suggest *not* being downtown. There are many spaces in Kent that would suit their needs just as well (if not better) and not face the possibility of being developed (especially if Standing Rock actually owned its own property or at least rented a property that included its own yard). There are also things like rooftop gardens that could be utilized. Downtowns are designed to be high-density areas. The area where this empty lot sits isn't zoned for parkland, it's zoned for high-density commercial and residential development. It has sat as "green" space simply because up until now, no one wanted to develop it after demolishing what was previously there (like a lot of other lots downtown).
Jon Ridinger June 15, 2012 at 04:43 am
I am not aware of any risk that the Pufferbelly will be closed. It's likely referring to the original effort in the early 1970s to save what is now the Pufferbelly from demolition. At the time, the old depot was in serious need of repair and many felt it was better to tear it down since there was no longer any need for it (passenger service had stopped by then). The near loss of that building was what got the Kent Historical Society started as they raised money to buy and renovate the building before the Pufferbelly moved in around 1981. That has been mentioned a few times in relation to saving the Wells-Sherman House.
David Badagnani June 15, 2012 at 05:58 am
Clearly, since Standing Rock Cultural Arts has been there for twenty years and is one of the greatest assets our community has to offer, there is a good relationship between the owner of the property and the management of SRCA. If by "losing their spot" you are implying that this long-standing and award-winning arts organization might be evicted for some reason (such as the possibility of increased dollars), the fact that this has not happened also indicates that the landlord is an ethical person, who would be unlikely to create a situation like last year's surprise eviction en masse of 250 elders of our Kent community by another Kent property owner. The fact that such a situation could even have been considered, let alone implemented, has brought enduring shame to our city, and is not soon to be forgotten, but it can be used as a learning experience, in order to avoid any further black marks on our treasured community.
Lisa Regula Meyer June 15, 2012 at 10:59 am
Jon, I don't think anyone's "assuming property ownership" and as has been stated before, Standing Rock and other people would like to buy that property. The argument that I'm making, and that I'm hearing the most, is that the good done to the neighborhood by saving this house is far less than the good that this space does as it currently stands. I fail to see how this house is going to increase density; it's 800 sq ft, I've seen no plans to house people there, at most it might have a handful of offices of people that are already downtown anyway, and maybe a person staffing the house. That's not an increase in density, considering how many people use that space on a daily basis- from the community, not just from Standing Rock. This is a classic case of the good of a few being given priority over the good of the many, but as Sally has stated in other comments, they have influential people that want this to happen.
Kentite June 15, 2012 at 12:17 pm
Exactly, and the eviction of the "250 elders" was not stoppable. Same is true for SRCA if their landlord dies or simply decides to sell. Once again, why worrry about an adjacent, privately owned, neglected empty lot if your primary site not truly secure? Shouldn't SRCA and its supporters be looking to purchase a better location with ample, decent green space and thus stabilize the organization's future? The current building is in deplorable condition. Why blame and interfere with others when your own house is clearly not in order.
Sarah Hilary June 15, 2012 at 02:06 pm
What about placing it where the Robinhood used to be?
Cy June 15, 2012 at 03:38 pm
John, I, too, enjoy Riveredge Park, though I would hardly consider it a natural wonder. It is a man-made park with a spillway that is beside a river. It doesn't mean it's not a nice place to be and it doesn't mean it doesn't have great value. It certainly does. The lot on N. Water serves a different purpose and meets different needs (especially with regard to the organic food being grown there). And I guess that is my point: We can agree to disagree about the kinds of outdoor space we enjoy and value more. I value your opinion. But the difference is, I'm wouldn't be okay with removing Riveredge Park to put a house on it, just because it doesn't meet my definition of a natural place. There should be room for natural places that meet diverse needs and have different aesthetics. Places like Riveredge certainly increase the quality of life in Kent for a lot of people. The lot as it is currently used on N. Water does, as well.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 04:44 pm
The Water Street property (green space) is not unkempt. It is routinely mowed, is gardened, and is weeded. There are no 4-foot high (or even 2-foot high or even 1-foot high, etc.) weeds across the space as can be seen in urban areas where lots truly are vacant, unused, and left to waste and become a public hazard.
The building that houses the gallery is rented but owned by the landlord who has the investment (and equity) in it. SRCA has discussed repair and renovation efforts with the landlord throughout the years and has also attempted to create and establish a more spacious community center, even at one time trying to raise interest in and support of moving into an existing building (College Street Library) that was later torn down but we were unable to receive enough support to make it happen at the time. The board has met and discussed repairs but is in agreement that the funds we do have (in a non-profit organization, our expenses must nearly meet our income as expected by a non-profit role in the community unless earmarked in special accounts that cannot be accessed) are most appropriate to fund the arts and cultural activities in our community, rather than use precious funds to add to the value of a building in our landlord's ownership. The expenses of maintaining a building are far more than for a green space and if we owned the green space, we would have ownership of this despite anything that might happen with our rented gallery location.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 04:47 pm
This space is also used for more than just a few SRCA activities. This space contains organic community gardens tended by individuals who are not on the SRCA board and other than the Executive Director. Often people buy a drink in Scribbles Cafe and then sit in the shade or sun of the yard and rest, relax, read, or study.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 04:51 pm
I am also intrigued by the idea that because there is a riverside park system (on the other side of downtown) that there, therefore, needs to be (and should not be?) additional green space in the community, particularly on the visually deadened North Water Street side of the community, where businesses, galleries, and residents are trying to revive the neighborhoods. We have a small plot of green space as you turn on to Crain from North Water Street and apparently that is enough to beautify the North side. In my honest opinion, no, it is not.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 04:54 pm
I don't have a photo to prove it (in fact, it goes back before the invention of the camera) but before that house that stood on the green space "for 50-60 odd years was demolished," blades of good old green grass on a "vacant" spot stood there. Maybe the library has some very old photos in its archives. I haven't checked out my facts but I'm confident they're accurate.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 04:58 pm
On another note and with all due respect, I welcome anyone to invite this home to a "vacant" spot (such as a yard that they've used and enjoyed) onto that property. Please consider that you will probably have rental expenses to use the new home's spaces in the place that you used freely by the grace of the property owner prior to the time it moved in.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:04 pm
I believe that Jeff is speaking of the repairs that the Pufferbelly is in need of now and for perpetuity to keep it preserved as it should be (not the original 1970's restoration effort).
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:07 pm
SRCA has been renting the gallery space for 20 years but welcomes the development of a cultural center. As a non-profit organization, our expenses must nearly meet our income unless earmarked (and inaccessible once earmarked) for other purposes, such as a new building fund. Our landlord has the expense and equity in our building and its repairs, renovations, and value. We responsibly use our funding for cultural arts purposes, which is what our organization was developed to provide to the community. Please see my other comment regarding the building and repairs above.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:07 pm
Please see my comments toward the top of the article in response to your questions. Thank you.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:08 pm
Sarah, that location is under development for another venture.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:19 pm
In response to Jon, the agreement in the past twenty years was that SRCA could use the property as long as it was tended (no field of knee-high weeds, trash, etc.).
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:24 pm
Also @ Jon: SRCA has a presence in the community and wishes, as such, to remain in the eye of the community. We also support sustainability and value it greatly. Our Executive Director lives an extremely sustainable life, which includes driving as little as possible. We believe in having a location in which the community can walk, rather than drive, in order to see us. Understandably, as an art gallery also, we wish to maintain a gallery space that has a window presence additionally, which is typical of art galleries, which are generally situated in either downtown areas, tourtist hotspots, or revitalized arts districts. I believe it is an organization that you're supporting that has indicated that no reasonable vacant lots exist to develop an arts center and accompanying green space or even to place a house-sized arts center.
Tina Puckett June 15, 2012 at 05:27 pm
Please excuse my typos. I didn't want to generate multiple messages to correct the errors, which are unusual for me, but I think people can determine what should appear. Thanks!
Native June 15, 2012 at 06:52 pm
SRCA is on a month-to-month lease at their current location, not what I would consider to be the most stable situation. (supposing their landlord were to die? What do they expect to happen to the property in which they currently find themselves?) If they are that determined to have a "yard", may I suggest some rental property on Brady Street nearby. There are several lovely homes for rent that would make a nice location for this non-profit agency. These homes have ample yards and would provide long term leases that would be a far more stable situation than the one they currently find themselves in at the moment. By renting an entire house and the land on which it is on, they would maintain control of their land and not have to fear anyone buying the land that they are using. I would suggest that this might be the best alternative for where they find themselves now, in a dilapidated building that is sorely in need of work by its owner.
A house would also provide more space for the kinds of activities in which they might wish to engage the community. Just a suggestion, but one that might help SRCA to continue their mission unabated by having a much nicer space in which to continue their valuable work.
Tina Puckett June 16, 2012 at 12:28 am
SRCA is on a month-to-month lease because we earned it over the past 20 years and the landlord knows we're not going to suddenly pack up shop and skip out on him and the rent. It's interesting to know that landlords who own properties on Brady Street do not ever die or run into misfortune that would cause them to have to sell or abandon their properties despite a lease. That seems like some flawed logic. Again, our gallery benefits from having a storefront, not a house in a tucked-away neighborhood where no one would notice that an art gallery exists but thank you for the suggestions.
Tina Puckett June 16, 2012 at 12:39 am
I would like to clear up some misstatements here for the individual who won't stand behind those statements with his/her own name.
The gallery has NEVER run an event with no heat in the winter. Those who know the gallery know the heating sources which are located on the wall and around the room. There are no forced air blowers that make noise and we don't run up bills by keeping the heat on higher temperatures but the heat is always on for a winter event, even including this mild unseasonably warm winter that we had this past year (another fact that was either not considered or omitted from that statement). Misinformation can be hurtful to an organization and if for any reason, it is stated in the press out of a sense of malice or spite, it serves in the form of libelous and defamatory statements, which can lead to lawsuits in some cases so it might be good as a commenter to know the facts before spreading false information. There are a lot of litigious people in the world who would jump on a lawsuit in a heartbeat for that.
Jim Williams June 16, 2012 at 04:15 am
I stand by my original arguments. Cy ( I think I got your name right ), while "natural wonder" might be a minor overstatement, the work that was done to return the river to its channel and preserve the natural look and feel is an amazing feat of good community planning and management. And to you and Tina, I never stated this as an either/or debate, however the original letter referred to the lot as "one of the last green spaces in downtown Kent," which is utterly preposterous, as is referring to the river park as "on the other side of downtown." In my opinion, North Water Street exists as a business/commercial zone, and development is appropriate and necessary there to ensure the existing organizations, including SRCA, thrive. Again, while I'm not sure the Wells/Sherman house is really worth saving, having an additional, attractive commercial building on that block would be an improvement to the empty lot.
Troy McClure June 16, 2012 at 01:51 pm
Thanks!
Saving the old depot was clearly a good move!
Native June 16, 2012 at 07:44 pm
I wonder how many people even know that Standing Rock IS an art gallery. Given the deplorable condition of the building, how many people would go out of their way to actually go down there and visit the gallery? It does not strike me as particularly welcoming or inviting to walk by a dilapidated building like that, and I would not be inclined to visit myself. My vision of an art gallery is a clean, welcoming and attractive building, much like the one in which the Kent State gallery shares with the Black Squirrel store. If I were to start a business in downtown Kent, it certainly would not be in a crumbling wreck of a building unless the owner planned to do some serious fixing up of the facilities. It is my belief that Standing Rock ought to prevail upon their landlord to invest some serious money into fixing up his property to make it far more inviting to potential visitors and customers. Perhaps if the house in question is eventually relocated there and restored as planned, it might spur some investment by the owner of the building in which Standing Rock finds itself to restore his own property so as not to have it look even shabbier than it already does standing next to a beautifully restored historic house.
Given the devastation of North Water Street in the 1970s and how it does not seem to have ever fully recovered, I would hope that the relocation and restoration of the house will jump start a restoration of North Water Street to its old vitality again.
Paxton Crenshaw June 16, 2012 at 08:42 pm
"he knows his claret from his beaujolais..."
Lisa Regula Meyer June 16, 2012 at 09:53 pm
For all the great things that Standing Rock does for Kent- the ice carving and apple cider festivals, Who's Your Mama?, sidewalk cinema, art exhibits, workshops, music, and much, much more- the thing you choose to critique is their building? Have you been to Columbus's Short North and seen the galleries there that aren't in good condition either? Would you rather they spend money on programming or renovations (many of which should be the building owner's responsibility)? Instead of running down SRCA, how about making a donation and investing in your community?
Pat June 17, 2012 at 01:31 pm
I am in favor of cleaning up this spare lot in Kent as it normally looks like a dump, much does the gallery. I think the house would be perfect--maybe it's neighbor would clean their business.
Allan Orashan June 18, 2012 at 03:57 am
SRCA could use the house as a year round addition to their space, for gallery shows and activities. They would probably still have available the back half of the yard for outdoor activities.
Holly Bloom June 21, 2012 at 03:38 pm
Are we sure we want to gentrify ALL of Kent?
Part of this town's greatest charm is it's grass roots art and music culture. Don't squelch it.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kent Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Chris (Kit) Myers June 19, 2013 at 09:20 am
Yeah, it's tough having to cross railroad tracks on a bike trail provided by the taxpayers for youRead More to use free of charge. I feel your pain...
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 01:25 pm
Thanks for the information Gary. Last I was told we can expect it to open this summer.
Mary June 19, 2013 at 05:42 pm
It's looking good. I can't wait!
Linda Davis, founder of Loved Ones of Prisoners, a support group for families.
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Linda, Kudos! Tough subject to not only approach but create a whole support group. I'm going toRead More pass judgement and say I think you are great!
Sa;;y June 16, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Paula, While I believe there are truly good people out there who have nothing but the bestRead More intentions for others, this story does not shock nor surprise me. I attended meetings with a friend who was court ordered. They couldn't drive and I figured I would sit with them instead of driving back and forth. AA claims not to be a religious sect but all the meetings and steps center around God. Not that I have a problem with God, but some people don't believe. Our courts (Judges) sentence people to attend meetings for DUI. I find this sad and irresponsible. One, it's religion. Two, you are sending alcoholics in to a group of other alcoholics who are not trained to help people with addiction. AA teaches people they are "helpless and powerless". Really? An individual has to find strength from within to fight the addiction. Telling people they are helpless isn't going to help. Alcoholism is usually tied to mental issues or illness. Going into a room and listening to other people's depressing rock bottom stories made me want to leave and go drink. Paradise Club....... hmmmmmmm...... I am not surprised. The only reason these court ordered sessions continue is that it doesn't cost the court any money. DUI's are a money maker for the courts, police and all the attorney's out there. Ah, but that's another story. I hope there is a happy ending for all of those above and others like them who have suffered under the guise of AA.
Amber Rodriguez June 13, 2013 at 12:30 am
I just want to let people know that Dandelion has been found, thank all of you who expressed concernRead More and kept your eyes out for him.
Michelle Fredmonsky-Harvey June 19, 2013 at 10:30 am
SO HAPPY to hear that !!!! :)
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Does this not qualify? We're also the only news agency to report if he actually had an explosiveRead More device on him or not. Stories similar to what you've asked for almost all appeared last week. http://kent.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/man-arrested-after-threatening-to-set-off-bomb-at-kent-state_593fe0c4
Dave June 5, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Maybe it is just the start to a slow summer or a sign that there is nothing interesting going on inRead More Kent. The story you mentioned turned out to be pretty uneventful and more about a guy making false, not real, threats. The two stories that have seen the most face-time have been KRHS's valedictorian and the med helicopter. Maybe highlight achievements and products of local businesses we don't hear about. Run an interesting historical piece. Not trying to be argumentative but rather making a comment that the information provided as of late has been less than interesting.
amelfo June 7, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Matt -- no need to defend yourself. Considerate of you to respond, though.
Matt Fredmonsky (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 05:12 pm
It seems hardly anyone ever waits until the end of the procession to congratulate all the graduatesRead More at once.
lost cat is on the left in the photo
Patricia June 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm
I posted it to FB too, I live on Wolcott and I saw the flyer yesterday on a pole.
janetstavole June 4, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to everyone who is helping and has helped. Emmie is still missing but it helps to know soRead More many are looking out for her and us. Thanks again! Janet Stavole
janetstavole June 5, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Happy to report my cat was found....in a friends garage across 43 and about one quarter of a mileRead More away. Thanks to all of you who reposted our information on Facebook. Janet Stavole
Sue May 8, 2013 at 01:47 am
The school levy has passed. This is great news for the children of Kent. Thanks to everyone whoRead More voted for the levy.
Jim Williams May 8, 2013 at 02:05 am
Glad to see that 17% of Kent citizens were able to muster the energy to bother voting, and that theRead More majority of those few supported this very important issue. Congrats to the District for making the convincing argument. It's pretty clear that the chorus of "NO" that exists here on Patch is not representative of the majority.
Concerned Citizen May 8, 2013 at 02:58 am
Good voting LD
Teresa K. April 25, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I'm glad the League did their research. Have they ever researched and said: "no, we dont feelRead More the levy is needed?" For most of us, our research need only go as far as our wallets and income. If the schools with their million dollar budgets are feeling the crunch, imagine how average or lower average income homes are struggling. I am very suspect of the excellent w/ distincton rating and the asking of this levy at this time. How were we able to get that kind of incredible rating with NO ADDED FUNDS? Did the teachers wake up last year? Did the kids wake up? How did the school get such superior ratings THAT year and none in previous ones? why such a huge gap in time and ratings? The days of passing every school levy "just because", "we've never said no", "for the kids" or to keep our "property values" are over. The economy took care of that. No matter how you feel about the levy: PLEASE VOTE.
Sa;;y April 25, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I urge my fellow residents to send a message to the school board: The Board needs to face the factRead More of the current economic conditions involving the residents in the Kent city school district and come back with a request for a more reasonable millage. Otherwise, I think the levy will fail. Our city leaders encouraged businesses to come into the new development by granting concessions on taxes. Well, there goes the additional money!
Sue May 7, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Vote YES today for Kent children. Yes on the school levy.