Neighbors Still Oppose Towing; Willing to Work with Lake Street Property Owner
Land owner says towing company in process of buying site
A group of residents opposed to a towing company's relocation on Lake Street are reaching out to the property owner to try and find a compromise.
Steele Street resident Kirk Noden, the spokesperson for residents who oppose Baker's Towing & Auto Repair's proposed relocation to 634 Lake St., sent a letter to the property's owner, Tim Crock, this week offering help in finding a tenant for the space.
Baker's Towing is being forced to move from 667 Lake St., as it operates out of a building slated for demolition as part of the Gougler Industries complex razing. Crock, who ran Crock's Car Care for years before it was demolished for the new Sheetz gas station on Fairchild Avenue, bought the Lake Street property in April from Lesa Lillibridge for $156,000, according to the Portage County Auditor's Office.
In the letter, which is signed by Noden and other residents, he reiterated the nearby neighbors' opposition to the towing and auto repair proposal.
"Given that you purchased the building only three weeks ago, we suggest that we begin a fair and open process between you as the new owner of 634 Lake St. and the surrounding residents," Noden wrote. "Let us take the time together to look at the possible uses, to solicit community input and to work to find a win-win solution."
To start such a process, the neighbors asked for a good-faith effort from Crock of withdrawing his application for a "substitution of a non-conforming use" request with the Kent Board of Zoning Appeals. The property is zoned R-3 for residential use but obtained a non-conforming use permit several years ago to allow a storage and catering firm to operate there. The zoning board would have to grant the substitution request in order for Baker's Towing to move there.
The neighbors said that, in exchange for Crock's withdrawal of the zoning request, they would suspend their petition campaign against the relocation of Baker's Towing to his property. The residents also said they would create a committee to help Crock find a tenant for the property and survey the community to learn what people feel is most appropriate for the site.
"We are essentially offering to work with him to make his investment successful," Noden said in an email.
Crock, however, said it's not his place to withdraw the application. He said Aubrey Baker, the owner of Baker's Towing, submitted the application to the zoning board and is in the process of buying the property from Crock.
In a previous interview, Baker told Kent Patch that he was unable to find a suitable new location for his auto repair other than the property behind the Nodens' house. Buying land and building a new garage would force him to raise prices exorbitantly, Baker said.
Baker's request is preliminarily scheduled for the zoning board's June 18 meeting.
Crock said he doesn't believe Baker will withdraw the application to the zoning board before then.
"He’s looked. There’s nothing in the city of Kent," Crock said. "I can see the Nodens' concern. In my view, I think there should be restrictions placed on him to make sure he doesn’t go over his bounds."
Like the neighbors, Crock said he doesn't believe the new location should be used for impounding towed cars or storing dump trucks. Baker has said previously he wants to expand his auto repair service and do less impound towing.
But Crock pointed to other nearby car repair and body shops on Lake Street and said residents have lived for years without complaint with those businesses within a few blocks. He added that when the residents bought their houses they should have understood the commercial and industrial nature of much of Lake Street.
"If Baker does like he’s supposed to, I don’t see where there’s any big injustice here," Crock said. "I don’t see anything but him improving that property. Hopefully it all works out and everybody becomes happy at the end."
Brian
11:17 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
With all of the concern and interest about the property, perhaps the members of the "Organizing Committee" should offer to buy the property from Mr. Crock. That way, they could do with it what they like and wouldn't need to resort to "large scale organizing campaigns". That's how it works in a free market economy. In addition, they could also offer their assistance to the numerous other properties in the area that are in need of painting, lawn mowing, clean-up, etc. Where I grew up, if we had a neighbor that needed assistance, we offered to help them. Imagine what 60 plus people could accomplish! Adopting a proactive approach would lift the area up and eliminate reactive, un-productive situations such as the current one that fails to address the true issue: neighborhood blight. The City of Kent can also assist the effort by addressing the properties that are currently not maintained to code. Stop focusing on what MAY happen and work on what is happening NOW.
Teresa K.
2:31 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
@Brian: re: "Stop focusing on what MAY happen and work on what is happening NOW." An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Do we wait til we get pregnant to start using birth control?
Brian
2:28 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
What is so hard to understand about my point? Lake Street has at least a dozen properties that are not to code. There are many others that are in need of painting, mowing, etc. Yet, the neighborhood and the City have done NOTHING about them, but now folks are exerting TREMENDOUS effort to stop something that is consistent with the present condition of Lake Street. Following your "logic", the area already has a household of babies and needs a vasectomy. But by all means, ignore the big picture and focus on a property that may actually be improved.
Kirk Noden
8:28 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
It is unfortunate that Tim isn't going to work with us. He's the owner of the property and he's responsible for whatever has been proposed for its use. And in response to his comment that we should have "understood the commercial and industrial nature of much of Lake Street", I would offer he should have looked at a map of the zoning code and been aware that he was buying a residential property zoned R-3 before he decided to move a business there that was previously operating in an industrial zoned location. Neighbors made an investment on that block based on the zoning code and that the city would uphold it. I didn't buy a house next to Ametek or any of the other commercial businesses on Lake Street. I bought a house on block that has been zoned residential for 40 years.
Brian
2:39 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
"I would offer he should have looked at a map of the zoning code and been aware that he was buying a residential property zoned R-3 before he decided to move a business there that was previously operating in an industrial zoned location." - I agree.
Kentite
6:23 am on Friday, May 18, 2012
I sympathize with the residents of the Steele, Miller and Harvey block. The dump trucks start very early in the morning and make huge, earth-shaking noise. Anyone would not accept that type of activity in a residential neighborhood. Such heavy vehicles belong on the north side of Lake Street and no closer. I heard those trucks when they were parked behind Davey Drill and came up Oak Street at 6 am.
Brian
2:35 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Do you think the additional 30 feet will abate the "huge, earth-shaking" noise?
Resident of Kent
1:12 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Well, I am a resident of the Carter Rental properties and I can say for sure that from day one the tow trucks have been cutting through the graveled section between the properties w/cars in tow.. and I have operated diesel equipment for over 10 years and I know the idling those machines require in the winter time.. they won't get turned off either because it's harder on the engines that way.
There is a little blue car that has sat at the edge of their lot right next to ours for three weeks now w/out moving... the car storage has already begun.
At first I was excited to see people "fixing up" the property because I for one dislike seeing good property go to waste.. but then I was informed by an employee that the house on the rear of the property would be demolished soon after purchase.. meaning more stored vehicles in the back, more noise, more idling, more destruction.
It is not right that the lives of many should be altered for the gains of a few.