patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

LOOK: Proposed Kent Police Station Images Released

Tax on November ballot would pay for new $18 million building

 
0 of 0
Proposed Kent Police Station
This architectural rendering by David Sommers & Associates shows what a proposed new Kent Police station would look like at the corner of Summit and South Water streets. Courtesy Kent Police
Photos (3)

Photos

This architectural rendering by David Sommers & Associates shows what a proposed new Kent Police station would look like at the corner of Summit and South Water streets.
This architectural rendering by David Sommers & Associates shows what a proposed new Kent Police station would look like at the corner of Summit and South Water streets.
This architectural rendering by David Sommers & Associates shows what a proposed new Kent Police station would look like at the corner of Summit and South Water streets.
Pdfs (1)

Pdfs

Kent Police released this FAQ on the proposed tax increase for a new police station.

Kent Police officials are working to inform the public about a proposed new facility that would be paid for by an income tax increase on the November ballot.

Today the department is hosting public tours of the existing station, and safety officials also released these architectural renderings of what a new police station would look like at the corner of Summit and South Water streets.

The proposed income tax increase of 0.25 percent would increase Kent's tax rate to 2.25 percent. The roughly $1.3 million generated each year by the tax increase would be used for property acquisition, design, construction, maintenance and repairs, future expansion or replacement of a new police building.

The total estimate for replacing the aging police station is $18.36 million

The department also released a "Q&A" fact sheet about the proposed tax increase in relation to the new station. The document is attached to this article.

Editor's note: Look for more information on this issue in coming stories on Kent Patch.

Related Topics: Architectural Renderings, Police Station, income tax increase, and kent police

Wade

8:48 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

There's a black SUV running a red-light right in front of the police station, hahaha.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mars

10:18 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

The only thing missing is a pedestrian running for their life across the crosswalk...

Comment_arrow

David Reith

10:52 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Good eye! Funny. Remembers not to hire David Sommers & Associates, LLC

Teresa K.

10:25 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Let me be the first to say: I hate it. I dont like the different colors of the brick. I dont like the different roof levels. It is not pleasing to the eye.

Who designed the current PD? The outside still looks modern, not dated at all, and
has held up great.

Reply

Teresa K.

10:26 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

@Rex: you are so right.... that is a very high pedestrian area.

Reply

Jason Mason

3:59 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

This is definitely overkill for Barney Fife. Just because the judges got a new courthouse, the cops feel left out. The old Tops building with its enormous parking lot would have served BOTH entities at an astoundingly lower price. They could even have a sizable jail to hold all of those slovenly 20year old students caught imbibing in alcohol! They would have recycled a blighted area and had ample parking for all the increased business these legal piranhas are anticipating. With this crummy economy, there is NO WAY this tax should be passed! The court house is not necessary, either. The cops say the basement leaks when it rains... I will head down to the ReStore today and get them another sump pump! This is NOT NYPD...

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Kasha Legeza

6:36 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

The answers to questions being posed here are available in the .pdf file that accompanies this article ... and, the department is offering weekly in-depth tours of the building right up until election time. http://patch.com/A-xPs3

Reply

Alisha Wright

9:15 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

So sad, I wish people would raise money and vote for the school levy. Every student should have bussing, field trips and access to extracurricular activities!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jon Ridinger

3:31 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Historically, Kent has always passed school levies. No reason to think the one in March will be any different, and, in my opinion, actually hurts the chance of this income tax passing.

Very pro 2nd amendment!

2:37 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

It would be nice to such frivoulous spending even make the ballot.

Reply

Alisha Wright

4:30 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

The point I'm making is that Kent schools have decided to cut bussing for students who live in a 2 mile radius and I believe for the high school students a well. When was the last time that the levy was able to pay for a major school renovation? There are drafty windows and leaks in every school. PTAs are coordinating fundraisers to pay for fieldtrips, teacher appreciation days and school supplies. I'm simply saying that 18mil is a whole lot of money. I have to agree with Jason Mason on this issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Traci Monroe

7:15 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Where did you hear Kent was cutting bussing? The drafty windows and leaks are due to poor maintenance, they deliberately withhold proper maintenance so they can sucker people into passing levies. School funding through tax levies is unconstitutional yet people keep passing them, it makes no sense.

Pat

10:40 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

The Kent Police are over the top on this new station. Plus a flat roof--how stupid--the repairs of leakiy ceilings will be another problem. Any one who goes on the tour of KPD will see a building which is in need of repair. If the Kent Police had maintaned this building and put the jail up stairs and closed off the wet basement they would have plenty of space in the current building. I for one am voting against the income tax increase.
As far as the school levy I shall also vote against it. When the schools goes back to one principal and one assistant then they could save lots of money. All grades at RHS has one assist. per grade level and of course each of these people have secretaries and secretaries have assistants--oh give me a break!! Cut back on these things and the city schools could save even more money. Plus someone needs to stop the students at KSU from voting unless they own property or lives here 365 days a year. Students should never be able to vote on our issues in Kent.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael B.

10:59 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Roosevelt has two assistant principals, each covering two grades. One secretary covers both principals.

Leave a comment