patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

No Ruling on Injunction for Wells Sherman House Relocation

Court considering permanent injunction request against relocation of historic house to North Water Street site

 

A Portage County magistrate has yet to rule on a request for a permanent injunction to stop the relocation of the historic Kent Wells Sherman House to a vacant lot at 247 N. Water St.

Portage County Magistrate Kent Graham listened to testimony from several witnesses Tuesday as Kent attorney John Plough argued for the injunction on behalf of the Kent citizens' group "Save the Standing Rock Garden."

Earlier this month, Portage County Common Pleas Court Judge John Enlow issued a temporary injunction on behalf of the group, which is comprised of supporters of the Standing Rock Cultural Arts, that temporarily stopped site work for relocation of the historic house.

The group originally filed an appeal to a September Kent Planning Commission ruling that approved a site plan for the historic house at that address between the Scribbles Coffee Company building and Standing Rock Cultural Arts.

Witnesses who testified Tuesday included Jeff Ingram, director of Standing Rock Cultural Arts, who was careful to clarify that the arts group is not a direct party to the appeal or injunction request.

Other witnesses included Roger Thurman, vice president of the Kent Wells Sherman House Inc. board, which is working to relocate the house.

After several hours of testimony Tuesday afternoon Graham continued the case until 9 a.m. this morning, when testimony is expected to continue at the Ravenna courthouse.

Check Kent Patch for updates on the case today.

Related Topics: Injunction, Relocation, Save the Standing Rock Garden!, Wells Sherman House, and court order

Chris (Kit) Myers

11:14 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Permanent injunction? Gee, I thought Wells-Sherman owns the lot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sue JEffers

9:34 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

i own my lot as well, but i cannot do just whatever i want with it. that is the purpose of zoning laws as well as guidelines for legislative decisions, neither of which are being followed in this case.

David Badagnani

2:04 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

This article would be even better if it discussed the actual content of the points raised in the appeal.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Matt Fredmonsky

3:53 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

I've attached a copy of the actual appeal (which was attached to an earlier story) so that you can read it at your leisure.

Mr Confederate Man

4:37 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

I say move the house to cover up that horrible graffiti, I mean art, it's a definite improvement to a not so nice part of town

Reply

Misty Jones

7:19 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Yeah, diversity must be a really tough ugly thing for a CONFEDERATE man. More from the Civil War era than that house!

Reply

Leave a comment