patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Issue 2 Vote Follows Similar Debates in Wisconsin and New Jersey

Arguments in Ohio echo those made earlier in other states where public employee collective bargaining has been restricted

 

While debate intensifies in Columbus and throughout Ohio regarding November’s vote on Issue 2 – which would restrict collective bargaining rights by public employees - the debate is one familiar in other states.

The Ohio version, signed into law earlier this year by Gov. John Kasich, followed measures championed in recent years by Republican governors in Wisconsin and New Jersey. 

In Wisconsin, passage of such measures sparked hard-fought campaigns to recall legislators who supported them, and in New Jersey, some proposals ran into stiff opposition in a statehouse controlled by Democrats.

In Ohio, union groups gathered enough signatures to force a November referendum on whether to overturn Kasich's work.

“It was part of a trend, many of the Republican governors elected in the last few years are reforming state and local government,” said John Green, the executive director of the Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron, in an interview with The Huffington Post. “Many of these reform packages have changes to bargaining as part of the reform process.”

Much debate over the law – which curtails the right of public employees to collectively bargain over certain benefits and makes other restrictions on what can be negotiated – echoes what was heard in Madison and Trenton during the earlier debates. Kasich’s argument that keeping the law is essential to balancing state and local budgets in an era of declining tax revenues is similar to what New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie used when pushing his own public employee proposals.

Similarly, arguments by Ohio unions that Kasich’s cuts to the state’s local government fund are the real cause of layoffs in local government echo what was heard in New Jersey when Christie cut local aid.

To explore these issues, Patch and The Huffington Post are collaborating on a series of articles regarding the Issue 2 referendum. This is the first installment in the series.

For the first installment of Huffington Post's coverage, please click here.

Coming Monday: Ohioans brace for an intense campaign, on the air and in your neighborhood, in the statewide referendum on curbing the power of public employees' unions

Related Topics: John Kasich, SB 5, elections 2011, and issue 2

Tom Baird

11:46 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011

"...statewide referendum on curbing the power of public employees' unions." Is the Patch reporting, or pushing an agenda here? Why isn't it "statewide referendum on curbing the power of State Government?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Noah Webster

7:47 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I suggest you make a call to the editor. At least one other Patch editor in another NEO community openly admits to being on the left side of the aisle. Of course it is well documented that there is a strong liberal bias in all media, some more than others.

Comment_arrow

Peter Grossetti

10:14 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

@ Noah Webster - if that "one other Patch editor in NEO" is a registered voter, then he/she has every right to vote ANY way they want. Wouldn't you want the same if he/she we on your side of the aisle?

Dave D

1:52 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

I am really disappointed that the Patch would be collaborating with the Huffington Post on anything. Their "journalism" consists of op ed pieces, masquerading as news coverage. Even though I may agree with some of their opinions, I would not consider anything on Huffington to be unbiased journalism.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Curt Fell

1:59 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

Let me guess, you consider Fox News as actual news?....

Comment_arrow

Dave

4:08 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

Patch is owned by AOL which also owns Huffington Post...

Comment_arrow

Dave D

8:43 am on Friday, September 23, 2011

No, I would have to say Fox news and Huffington post are very similar. Their news reporting is slanted by their political bias. I did not know the ownership of Patch. I honestly can say the stories and news seem to be for the most part, unbiased in the Patch.

Comment_arrow

James Thomas

1:30 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

Curt Fell,
Let me guess,
you consider the New York Times actual news.

Phil

6:50 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

The state is basically attempting to balance the budget by cutting aid to the cities by 25% immediately and 50% next year. This means that the cities will have to raise taxes to keep services. If goverment would learn to spend with what it has and not what it projects we would not have this issue. By attempting to balance the budget by shorting the cities and then blaming the unions is typical politics to cover up the real issue, theft by the goverment. Before you vote look at the problems this will cause. This will not solve the problem, only create a bigger one. Make the politicians accountable before they spend your money. Just look at how our tax dollars are spent.

Reply

Ricky Stowater

8:11 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

My Comment Part One:
I see a benefit to SB 5 for teachers. Many, including myself, would love to see the teaching profession elevated. Unfortunately it is a profession viewed by many to be glorified babysitting, leaches on the public dole, undeserving of a professional wage. The reason for this unfortunate view is partly the fault of our society as a whole in this country (look at Finland, where teachers are revered and they are scoring much higher than the US on tests), and the unions are also part of the blame. I, along with many others, would like to see the teaching profession elevated to the level of doctors and lawyers, but the unions are holding them back. Think about it... Many teachers will tell you that they are professionals, with professional degrees (many with Master's degrees) and they must consistently continue their education to keep their teaching license. Teachers are trained professionals, and most are masters at their craft; you try controlling and teaching a room full of 30-something teenagers, a fourth of which either have a learning disability or ADHD and no interest in trying to learn. The unions are holding teachers back from being viewed as professionals for various reasons. Teachers will tell you they are trained professionals, the unions will tell you they are blue collar, middle-class workers. Yes, teachers are middle class but they are college educated professionals, not blue collar factory workers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave D

8:58 am on Friday, September 23, 2011

I would have to agree, good teachers should be paid more, and most of them are good. But let's face it, if they were paid more they should plan for retirement like other professionals do, not on the backs of the taxpayers.

Comment_arrow

Harry H.

11:00 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

yes the unions are holding them back that is why all the teachers in the the state are against SB5. Please! not fooling anyone. we know that the real agenda is to brak the unions and lower the status of hard working middle class families. Unions are keeping the corrupt politicians from cannning good senior teachers in favor of cheaper less expenrienced ones.

Ricky Stowater

8:16 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011

My Comment Part Two:
The unions need teachers to be blue collar, middle class workers so that they can garner the support of all blue collar workers by tugging at their middle class heartstrings.
If we want to view teachers as the professional as they are, let's look at some things lawyers and doctors have in common but don't have in common with teachers. Doctors and lawyers don't have unions to protect the bad eggs. The teaching profession is losing respect because a small percentage (probably about 15%) of the population is not good at what they do, or just outright very bad at what they do. But the unions protect them. If a doctor does a bad job, they're gone or they at least suffer consequences.

I'm getting tired and running out of things to say because I'm exhausted but I just want to conclude by saying that I think SB 5 will benefit teachers by eventually helping to elevate the profession. It's one step in the right direction

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl

12:33 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

One of the first things Kasich did when he took over the Capital was to GENEROUSLY RAISE the salaries of the cronies he installed in various positions. That wasn't fiscally responsible when he's asking everyone else in the state to take cuts in pay and benefits and giving up their rights to bargain for decent pay, etc. How does one do that? What kind of message did he send to the people of Ohio? Giving TAX CUTS to the corporations and the rich with 2 ongoing wars is NOT responsible. It hasn't created jobs in Ohio for well over a decade.

Doctors have the AMA and lawyers have the ABA. More often than not, IT TAKES A GREAT DEAL TO GET RID OF BAD LAWYERS AND BAD DOCTORS. Passing SB 5 isn't going to "elevate" anybody except put more taxpayer money into big business's pockets. Most Republicans are against education, and especially higher education because they believe colleges are all "liberal" and they "spread" liberalism to the "innocent minds". What they want is for religious institutions to "educate" and brainwash the young to their political way of thinking.

Professions = "pro". Do you want a doctor doing mechanical work on your car? Do you want a mechanic performing surgery on your body? Do you want a politician out there on the ball field playing for the Cleveland Indians? How about a high school dropout for a politician or president? Decreasing quality of life for Ohioans isn't going to help anyone.

Comment_arrow

Harry H.

2:48 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

You forgot to mention that Finland is 100% union teachers. No union will result in less wages and benifits, less job stability, larger classroom sizes and the end of public education. You will be able to take your voucher and if your rich enough you will be able to get a good education. The middle class and poor will just have to suck it up. Besides Issue 2 effects a lot more than teachers! Want to fix tenure? Then fix it. Don't attack every worker in the state by dismantling unions and leaving the middle class hanging in the wind under the rule of the wealthy.

Comment_arrow

Ricky Stowater

4:31 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

Teachers will be eligible for raises based on merit. Kasich has even said that he would like to see great teachers get paid well. Kasich has worked closely with Michelle Rhee, who as chancellor of DC schools, offered a very generous payscale to the teachers (they could earn up to $120,000) based on their job performance.

The teachers unions are corrupt, I personally know many conservative teachers who are ticked off that their local union is affiliated with the OEA and NEA who consistently funds liberal, Democratic politicians with their dues. I know a lot of teachers who do the Fair Share fee because they've had it with the union thuggery. And to the Tea Partiers, believe it or not there are many conservative public school teachers who agree with many aspects of SB 5 and who HATE the fact that the teacher unions are so corrupt and force fair share fees on those who do not want to join.

No union will only result in lower wages for the teachers who don't properly do their job. The teachers who go above and beyond the call of duty will be rewarded.

"leaving the middle class hanging in the wind"---That's my point! Why do teachers have to be blue collar, middle class laborers? Teachers are professionals in every sense of the word with Bachelor's or Master's degrees. The unions are holding the profession down and generating disrespect for teachers. Just look at the awful things people here on Patch say about teachers it disgusts me and I think SB 5 will help..

Comment_arrow

Tim Tolentino

4:41 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

Michelle Rhee Lied and then Quit!

http://www.bluejersey.com/diary/18135/yep-michelle-rhees-school-reform-was-a-fraud

Makes sense kaisch worked with this woman!!!

just google her name and read about the fraud

Comment_arrow

Tim Tolentino

4:44 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

Michelle Rhee group StudentsFirst dumps $1M into Michigan lobbying effort during teacher tenure reform push

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/09/michelle_rhee_group_studentsfi_1.html

Wow where did she get a million dollars to donate for tenure reform.

Now she is a lobbyist!

more and more sense of her realtions with Kasich

Comment_arrow

Michael Rhea

1:56 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Ricky you posted- "Kasich has worked closely with Michelle Rhee, who as chancellor of DC schools, offered a very generous payscale to the teachers (they could earn up to $120,000) based on their job performance.

The teachers unions are corrupt..."

Have you really never read what was reported by USA Today, the NY Times and others regarding the "suspiciously high test-score gains at 41 Washington schools while Ms. Rhee was chancellor.

At some schools, they found the odds that so many answers had been changed from wrong to right randomly were 1 in 100 billion."

The teachers and administrators suspected to have changed the answers got huge bonuses. as you mentioned. Is this really what you want to promote?

Comment_arrow

Ricky Stowater

12:34 pm on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Michael,

I hardly consider the McPaper and NY Times to be objective sources for this topic as they are very left-leaning newspapers, so they will of course try to make Michelle Rhee look bad. I highly doubt Rhee was encouraging teachers to change answers on tests. This has happened in other school districts as well, including Atlanta. That is simply a result of unethical teachers in the system. This problem will exist regardless of whether or not SB 5 passes as long as we are placing such a heavy emphasis on standardized test scores. This type of high stakes, one size fits all type of testing is not working in our country. It of course works in places like China and Finland because their cultures are very homogenous. It will not work here because we live in a multicultural, individualistic society. It will also not work because some kids just aren't good at taking tests. Using standardized tests to measure students' progress is a bad idea.

Comment_arrow

Michael Rhea

6:43 pm on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Ricky- You posted "That is simply a result of unethical teachers in the system. This problem will exist regardless of whether or not SB 5 passes as long as we are placing such a heavy emphasis on standardized test scores."

You do realize that Michelle Rhee PROMOTES using standardized test scores for merit pay, right? I'm assuming you didn't bother to read any of the articles on the cheating scandal based on your comments. You seem to be advocating both sides of the issue.

Comment_arrow

Rob Baker

12:23 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011

"It will also not work because some kids just aren't good at taking tests. Using standardized tests to measure students' progress is a bad idea." but a great idea for teacher merit pay.. too funny

Dave D

9:05 am on Friday, September 23, 2011

Hey Earl, I resent the implication of Gov Kasich secret alter ego being the 1776 guy.
Hey, 1776 guy how many guns can you buy at $10.00 an hour? Maybe you are just trying to get a reaction by your comments, but unfortunately, the only reaction you will get is astonishment that someone that ignorant is able to read.

Reply

Carol T

12:38 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

"I would have to agree, good teachers should be paid more, and most of them are good. But let's face it, if they were paid more they should plan for retirement like other professionals do, not on the backs of the taxpayers."

Dave how can someone who works for the public and is paid by the public plan for retirement "not on the back of the tax payers"

This is a really misconceiving. Do you agree that the work they perform is in exchange for their paycheck? Because my opinion is once they receive their money it is exactly that - their money.

If you believe it is still public money once they receive it - it would be impossible to plan on retirement with any other money but the public's.

If a teacher buys a product from your company - is the money still considered public? If that's the case your paycheck is also partly on the backs of the tax payers, probably your pension too.

When is tax money - no longer property of the tax payer? My best hones guess is once it is traded from goods or services.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave D

12:42 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Yes, once They receive their checks, it is their money. But before we agree to give them OUR money, we should have a say in how much they get. The very people who, in the end decide how much these public servants are paid, have jobs that are dependent on the dollars contributed by the unions negotiating against them. Now, what is wrong with that picture?

T.Bagger

4:27 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

does it come with a pension too?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Thomas

9:37 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Yes it does.
It's Union managed and has the deed to a bridge in Brooklyn and extensive real estate holdings 20 miles due east of Miami.

Curt Fell

11:03 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011

Question from James Thomas: "Curt Fell, Let me guess,
you consider the New York Times actual news."

Answer: Well, as long as they keep employing Pulitzer Prize winning journalists, there credentials will always be considered more trustworthy than Faux Snooze: http://www.nytco.com/company/awards/pulitzer_prizes.html

So, "James", any more juvenile questions? Or you too busy sucking down more of that Insani-Tea?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Thomas

8:58 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Oh yeah,
Pulitzer Prize winners. The goal of winning the prize from the Progressive Enhancement Center does not lend any credibility to the "journalists" of the old gray lady. Just like the "Nobel" prizes for Gore and Obama they have ceased to have any meaning. Only those who have no integrity believe that these "awards" have credibility. Look at the figures for readership/subscription/viewing. NYT/Time/Cnn/ABC/NBC/CBS/et al. all down. Fox/Breitbart/Drudge all up. We are not accepting the idea that these "news" sources have any validity. They are the minions of the Democratic Party and "nuff said".

Comment_arrow

Michael Rhea

11:06 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Students in FInland are ranked #1 in the world. They view their teachers very differently than we do in the US. You might find it interesting reading.

Comment_arrow

James Thomas

11:21 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Michael R,
When was the last time Finland meant anything on the world stage? Then again, maybe they are smart enough to just keep to themselves.

Curt Fell

11:02 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

So, James Thomas, evidently all of the news agencies other than Fox are biased? A little paranoid, are we?

Now, let's talk about being biased. Try putting in the search words "obama deportation record" into any search engine (google, yahoo, bing, etc) or into any news agency website. Did you find results? What's that you said? Every site returns results related to the search criteria? What?!?!? OOOOOHHH, every site EXCEPT foxnews.com? Aha...now there is the definition of "Fair & Biased".

I wonder why Fox News doesn't want to let their viewers know the facts that Obama has a higher deportation record of any other President since Eisenhower?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Thomas

11:13 am on Saturday, September 24, 2011

No Curt,
I acknowledge the Conservative slant of Fox, you deny the Overwhelmingly Obvious Liberal Bigotry of the MSM.

linda

10:40 pm on Saturday, September 24, 2011

Individual taxes are high in Finland, but they do have an excellent educational system. Teachers are given a lot of respect and I believe that the general population there values education. To me, it is shameful that the US is falling in ranking on the world stage in academics. My daughter-in-law is Finnish and speaks three languages fluently. I'm sure she is tempted to take her kids back there to be educated.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Rhea

12:42 pm on Sunday, September 25, 2011

Linda- One of the measures of how countries are doing is the PISA ((the Program for International Student Assessment) and this is where Finland ranked at the top.

You might find it interesting to read an article breaking down the results by income level at http://nasspblogs.org/principaldifference/2010/12/pisa_its_poverty_not_stupid_1.html

The gist of the article is that if you compare low poverty level schools in the US to those in Finland, we scored higher than they did.

The question I am left with is what direction will we be moving. In Stow, people have spoken out stating they believe we should be cutting AP classes to save money. Where would that lead us over the long haul? I believe families look at a school system when they are choosing where to live. What will attract people to Stow?

Harry H.

7:20 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011

Google it, read a book whatever. This is a good segment to sum it up. althoug I know you will try to say it is biased. watch it anyway.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-march-3-2011/diane-ravitch

Reply

James Thomas

9:44 am on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Watched it,
Finland's schools are ALL CHARTER SCHOOLS. That's why they're so good.

Reply

Dave D

12:35 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

I feel teachers are professionals and they are paid accordingly. They are paid like nurses, police, engineers, accountants and many other professions. Doctors and Lawyers, make more, because they are required to have a higher initial education, which of course is much more expensive, and they are willing to work 80 to 120 hours a week. They are paid solely for their talent and ambition. How many teachers, police officers, or firefighters, work their professions that many hours a week, without holidays or vacatios? The more ambitious one work a second job or have a business on the side. This is only possible because their jobs require less hours that many other professions. Be careful what you wish for because in the real world, higher pay usually requires sacrifice, not a union vote.

Reply

Wendy

5:58 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Stop the bickering! Issue 2 is bad law because it targets public union employees, not ALL public employees. Give me a law aimed at ALL public employees, and we'll talk.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robin Anderson

10:07 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Only one part of SB-5 is targeted at all public employees and rightly so. That's the 33% reduction in paid sick days earned per year, from 15 to 10. Notice how the Administration is not touting just how much money that simple change is going to save public employers?

Earl Elevant

1:13 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Anyone hear the blatant lies Kasich is throwing out these days?

He's saying that "All issue 2 does is makes public union workers pay 10% into their pensions and 15% toward their healthcare."

Seems most are already paying 10% into their pensions and it's AT LEAST 15% toward healthcare.

Funny how he leaves those parts out...as well as the rest of the negatives.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ward Benson

11:09 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

So, having those figures law bothers you why since you say they're already paying that amount?

Leave a comment