Issue 2 Opponents Canvass Kent
Kent firefighters, teachers and professors went door-to-door this weekend to talk about Issue 2 with voters
She isn’t eligible to vote for another seven years, but that didn’t deter Josie Coffee from going door-to-door on Kent’s west side Saturday with her firefighter father to drum up “no” votes for Ohio Issue 2.
Josie was one of a handful of people who participated in the Kent Fire Homecoming Canvass organized by We Are Ohio, “a citizen-driven, community-based, bipartisan coalition that has come together to stop SB 5 by voting NO on Issue 2,” according to the group’s Facebook page.
The 11-year-old volunteered to spend a couple cold, windy hours of her weekend canvassing neighborhoods with dad Jeff Coffee because she’s concerned about how Issue 2 would affect her family.
“I feel I should support him (her father) in what he believes in – and this (Issue 2) would really hurt his job and my mom’s job,” said Josie, whose mother, Julie, teaches fourth-grade in the Copley-Fairlawn City School District.
Jeff Coffee, who is also a paramedic, serves as vice president of the Kent Firefighters Association Local 721 of the International Association of Firefighters.
Coffee and fellow union members shared their stance on Issue 2 with signs and fliers in Kent State University’s Homecoming Parade, then gathered at Kent Fire Station One for canvassing instructions from Brad Cromes, Portage County field organizer for We Are Ohio.
The canvassing event – one of many planned in Kent through Election Day on Nov. 8 – also attracted two Kent State University professors and a retired elementary school teacher.
Six members of the Kent State College Democrats showed up for the training to prepare for their own upcoming canvassing events. President Bryan Staul said the organization “has made Issue 2 our main focus now through Nov. 8 … we’re going to be doing a whole week of phone calls and canvassing.”
Cromes told each participant it would be appropriate as they canvassed to share personal stories of how Issue 2, if approved, would impact their lives.
Repeat canvasser Polly Tucker of Kent has been sharing her teacher's perspective. The 40-year elementary school teacher retired in 2006 from the Cuyahoga Falls City School District, where she continues to work as a substitute teacher.
Tucker said she’s very concerned about how Issue 2 would affect student-teacher ratios in public schools.
“I taught before there was collective bargaining for teachers and there was no say in how many students were in a classroom,” she said. “My first year of teaching I had 36 first-graders who had never been to kindergarten.”
Coffee shares Tucker’s concern on behalf of his teacher-wife. Plus he’s worried about how Issue 2 could affect his family’s bottom dollar regarding healthcare costs, changes in fire department staffing levels and the related loss of contractual stipends.
“It’s not about being greedy,” Coffee said of his opposition to Issue 2. “SB 5 is an overall attack on the middle class that will have a negative impact on the local economy.”
Deb Smith, an associate professor of philosophy at Kent State, was canvassing Saturday on behalf of the Tenure-Track unit of the Kent State Chapter of the American Association of University Professors.
“What bothers me is that this is a threat to the very existence of our union because SB 5 contains language … that declares faculty at universities as management, so we would be barred from collective bargaining,” Smith said.
Representing the Full-Time Non Tenure Track unit of AAUP-KSU on Saturday was its president, Tracy Laux, who teaches mathematics. The Kent resident is opposed to everything about Issue 2.
“I would like the state legislature to leave my firefighters, my police, my street and sewer workers and my daughter’s school teachers alone in regard to their rights as workers,” Laux said.
The fight over collective bargaining and other public union rights in Ohio is up for a vote during the general election Nov. 8.
Laurel Myers Hurst
10:50 am on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
There are plenty of citizens working two or three, 10-40 hour per week "part-time" jobs with no benefits who have trouble supporting the "Vote No on Issue 2" crowd. Those full-time-part-timers may also be run too ragged to make it to the polls. The "Vote No" canvassers had the luxury of leisure time to roust votes in their support. I was working to pay for it.
Lawrence
5:56 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
I hate to burst your bubble, but Vote No on Issue 2 canvassers actually Don't have the luxury of leisure time either. But we do it for your benefit - just like the firemen, police officers & nurses work for your benefit. We work more than 50+ hrs a week without the benefit of overtime, we've already taken cuts to staff, not had raises in years....we are at our lowest limits of being able to serve you in a timely manner. I bet you weren't even aware of what HB194 was....it was a voter suppression law..that we Vote NO on Issue 2-ers also worked our behinds off to make sure you were able to vote next month. It is not the unions fault that you need to work more than one part-time job, but we feel for you just as if you were part of a union. Things will not get better if Issue 2 passes and you can bank on that.
Laurel Myers Hurst
9:21 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
A voter verification act that sets reasonable limits on the period and mode of voting is different from a voter suppression act. Have you worked as a poll place attendant? No one is ever denied the right to vote via provisional ballot. (http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=129_HB_194)
Sandy Dettis
4:04 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
It is amazing to me how anyone could be against firefighters, police, nurses and teachers or anyone who has worked to put themselves in a good position in life.. Firefighters and police must pass a civil service exam, mental health testing, physical tests and interviews. They then work to protect us 24/7. That is protect us with their lives. Teachers have to get an under graduate degree at a four year college and then their Masters Degree. Most teachers get more training like Reading Recovery or take their National Boards. Teachers also have to stay up on their continuing education. Nurses attend college and then nursing school and then more schooling. This group of people aren't just what their profession says they are they are role models, .pseudo parents, advice givers, a friend to those in need. These hard working people have dedicated themselves to others and deserve every penny they make, retirement paackages and benefits. Those who strive to better themselves and make a good living should not be our enemy. VOTE NO on issue 2!
Laurel Myers Hurst
5:17 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
It is too bad that firefighters, police and teachers are lumped together with hordes of middle-administrative and clerical-level public employees who also have a stake in collective bargaining. The masses of state employees that bloat the state budget are THE problem to a much greater degree than the small percentage of firefighters, police and teachers who stand to lose if collective bargaining rights are limited. As much as hard-working Ohioans might like to support firefighters, police and teachers, they can't afford to keep every public employee in the manner to which the have become accustomed. In the threat of a bankrupt public treasury, we don't have a choice but to vote Yes on Issue 2. [Nurses? Except for school nurses and a few nurses employed by entitlement programs, the vast majority of nurses in Ohio are employees of private and not-for-profit entities and shouldn't be affected by SB5/Issue 2. Please correct me if I am wrong on this count.]
It is absolutely true that fewer public employees can be retained if benefit and retirement packages are exorbitantly lavish. There has to be some market-based/supply and demand solution to balancing the equations.
Sandy Dettis
6:19 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Laurel first there are around 10,000 nurses in Ohio who are in public unions. Second you can't hold people like firefighters, teachers, police officers and nurses accountable for the state's so called "hordes of middle administrative and clerical-level public employees. Once again don't pull people down out of the middle class.
Laurel Myers Hurst
8:59 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
10,000 public nurses of 122,352 nurses in Ohio (according to StateHealthFacts.org)
L Babbey
4:34 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
I retired after working 33 years in the public system and several years in the private sector. During my entire working career in the public sector the percentage I paid into my retirement system was FAR more than what the private sector paid into social security. (10% vs. 2%) I also contributed to my health care costs for 20 years BEFORE friends in the private sector ever had to . My salary in the public sector was always lower than colleagues in the private sector an I NEVER earned overtime for my 40+ work weeks. The ads that "Building a Better Ohio" is running are complete lies. Voters in Ohio should support our public sector employees who have worked hard for this state. Vote NO on issue 2.
Laurel Myers Hurst
5:19 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Are you comparing the 10% retirement contribution you made to the 2% Social Security contribution? If so, you must ALSO compare your retirement income to Social Security retirement income.
Lawrence
5:45 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
The fact of the matter remains that the Public Employees did not cause this recession... the top 1% did. Laurel, remember what you chose to vote for the next time you happen to need a fireman, police officer or your kids are not getting the proper attention in school because their classes are too large. Issue 2 is not about paying for retirement...it is about breaking unions that are the reason private sector workers receive more than $1/hr for their 40-hr work week. If you are complaining that someone who chose to pay into their retirement account an extra 8% from their own check, PLUS 2% into Social Security for your retirement...think again who you should be criticizing. Try asking Gov Kasich how much he's paid into social security for your benefit....oh, that's right, he wants to cut social security... wake up
Laurel Myers Hurst
9:10 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011
1. Insolvency on a global scale caused this recession
2. I pay STRS, so I think I'm in a position to voice my opinion, though I don't intend to criticize.
3. If private sector workers receive $1/hr for their 40 hr. work week than union employees, why would you want to be part of a union?
4. Social security will have to be cut to balance the long-term budget crisis
Tiffany Jones
11:37 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Just reading and I'm certain you misunderstood the post in regard to your #3. He stated that unions are the reason we have fair wages and DON'T earn $1 per hr. Unions have done a great deal for this country,(private and public sector) but as with most things when we fail to learn from our past we will be forced to repeat it. Hopefully (and from what I have seen probably) enough of us HAVE learned and will not allow the government to use our struggling economy as a reason for yet another attack on unions and worker's rights.
Poodle Snacks
6:21 pm on Saturday, October 22, 2011
Love your comment! I truly hope enough of us have learned from our less than stellar history and aren't willing to repeat it, but I have my fears/doubts...