Fairmount Properties 'Building C' gets Architecture Board Approval
5-story building will feature 32 apartments, restaurant Bricco on ground floor
The newest building proposed as part of downtown Kent's redevelopment received a certificate of appropriateness from the Kent Architectural Review Board Tuesday.
The board signed off on plans for Fairmount Properties' "Building C," which will stand at the northeast corner of Erie and South DePeyster streets and will include 32 apartments with the restaurant Bricco on the ground floor.
Adam Branscomb, a development manager at Fairmount Properties, said the building design has changed somewhat — due to the owners' goals and project budget — since it was first proposed as part of the redevelopment along with the new Davey Tree and AMETEK buildings.
"There's a number of reasons why the design has continued to evolve," Branscomb said.
Ed Fehér, of Glavan and Fehér Architects, which is designing the building, told the architecture board that the evolution led to a fairly simple design with the restaurant on the first floor and apartments on all four upper floors.
"We've constantly been trying to tune this up," Fehér said.
Bricco will occupy all of the first floor, which is about 7,000 square feet total. The 32 apartments will be spread out with eight on each of the upper four floors. The apartments, which will be one and two bedroom units, will vary in size from 680 square feet to 1,200 square feet.
The exterior facade will appear similar to the buildings surrounding it.
Fehér said the brick work on the exterior will come from the same coloring and design that wraps the Davey Tree and AMETEK buildings — the neighboring buildings within the city's redevelopment block.
And the facades facing the Kent State University Hotel and Conference Center to the east and Acorn Alley to the north will mimic those projects' exteriors, he said.
"One of the things I constantly try to keep in mind with this building is respect to the buildings around it," Fehér said. "The buildings in Kent aren't massive. They're broken down quite a bit. And that's what we're trying to do with our building."
The timeline for construction of the building was not given Tuesday. It has yet to go to the Kent Planning Commission for site approval.
The architecture board voted unanimously yesterday to issue the project a certificate with little comment on the design.
Elizabeth Eaken, a member of the architecture board, said she liked the design presented Tuesday better than its previous incarnations.
"I think this responds better to what we've got going on here," she said.
Logan
8:29 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
I think that this building is absolutely awesome! I love the look of the building...it is actually different than all the other buildings downtown. The restaurant choice...AMAZING! My only concern is the cost of the apartments...I hope they are at least reasonable...
Mars
10:51 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
•Fourth and fifth floors - two 1,500 square feet or three 1,000 square feet luxury rental apartments per floor
http://kent.patch.com/articles/no-veterans-housing-at-acorn-corner-redevelopment
Matt Fredmonsky
10:57 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Amanda, that link is about a completely different building, Acorn Corner, aka the old Kent hotel.
Mars
5:59 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Thanks for the correction.
Sarah Skibiski
9:50 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
It looks great!
Roger Owens
9:36 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Okay, where are people supposed to park? Only in the new parking garage? What's that going to cost? I love the look of this redevelopment project; it makes downtown Kent so much more attractive, but, again, where am I supposed to park if I want to shop or dine there? I'm not sure I understand that there's been any big picture (or detailed) planning here. I'm thinking people who want to live here better not need a car too. These small companies that are trying to locate/operate downtown, I'm afraid, are not going to make it if people find it too hard to park nearby, especially when out's cold.
Heidi Shaffer
1:28 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
Yes, change is happening to our fair city, and we may need to make some changes in our expectations as well. Kent is choosing an urban model of development (vs. big box sprawl or suburban living). There is a reason people who live or work in urban areas are typically more fit. They walk! The joy of walking around in a vibrant urban area will more than make up for not scoring the most convenient parking place every time. I'm thinking of taking PARTA more often when the new transit center comes online...or walking or biking to downtown more often. There are plenty of reasonably-priced cabs for return service if the hour is late or weather turns bad. For drivers, shared resources such as the new courthouse parking lot is only one block from downtown. There are also underutilized parking lots on the north side of downtown, or even using the city hall lot after hours. Part of the plan, including installing meters on main streets, adding more handicap and 10-minute parking, is to mark all parking areas more clearly, including the "free" parking. People who live in high density urban areas usually make the choice to use their cars less and become ok with walking to them. I'm like everyone else when I drive. I look for the closest, but I am getting used to the idea that walking a block or two is not really that unpleasant, even when the weather is cold. In fact, I really enjoy the chance to join the growing number of people on the sidewalks!
Traci Monroe
7:41 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
That's all well and good Heidi, but what about the senior citizens? Oh that's right,those are the ones Kent/Kent State are trying to run outta town.