The Dunkin' Donuts planned for 525 E. Main St. received approval of its site plan from the Kent Planning Commission Tuesday.
The commission voted unanimously to approve the project with several conditions, including approval of a landscaping plan that must come back to the commission for a later vote.
Several members of the commission said they wanted to see improvements to the landscaping.
Commission member Peter Paino said unlike its neighbors the Dunkin' Donuts has very minimal landscaping.
"There's zero landscaping on site," Paino said.
Kent Bloom, the franchisee who will run the shop, said the Kent store, unlike other Dunkin' Donuts locations, features outdoor patio seating.
"At our other locations, this (space) tends to be landscaping," he said.
Bloom added that they could replace the patio area with greenspace.
The other conditions included a self-regulating noise reduction system on the drive-thru speaker and the addition of several bike racks.
The project was opposed by neighbor Sally Burnell, who rents in the house north of the site. Burnell and several other tenants must move so the house can be demolished for the new eatery.
Burnell suggested Dunkin' Donuts rent parking spaces from the neighboring Wendy's in order to avoid having to demolish the house.
"I am on a fixed income," she said. "This apartment is the only thing between me and homelessness."
Bloom said he didn't explore the option but said it likely wouldn't work because both businesses are competitors.
Commission member John Gargan said he sympathised with Burnell but that the planning commission couldn't intervene.
"I understand your concerns and I feel for you, but I believe this is a permitted use restaurant, and based on the guidelines we have to follow there’s very little leeway to consider trying to stop a private property transaction," he said.
Donald S
6:35 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
I cannot wait for Dunkin Donuts to be built. We are sick of driving to Ravenna for it!
Wade
7:03 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Wow, the owner sure has has to jump through a lot of hoops to being DD to Kent - has even had to listen to the silly Architectural Review Board. Kudos to him for not getting fed up with it all.
Personally, the only improvement I would have suggested would be to have gone with a Krispy Kreme franchise. :)
Traci Monroe
7:47 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
What is it with the "green space" crap all of a sudden, Kent long ago allowed it's "green space" be eaten up by development now they want to get picky about "green space" they need to decide do they want "green space" or money producing businesses. Hey DD use Green pavers for your patio that will be "green space".
Laurel Myers Hurst
8:37 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Agreed that a patio space makes this business more productive and more profitable. He shouldn't be required to put "greenspace" on what is now an asphalt lot. How about big potted plants on that patio?
Joseph Hughes
9:14 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
It goes without saying that the irony inherent in this story and the accompanying comments is off the charts.
Teresa K.
9:32 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Sally, I'm with you on DD. I think the design is ugly and distracting. I think it needs toned down.
Kent should be worried about long term sustainability for all the new businesses.
Sarah James
8:06 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
This is a private transaction. It sucks, but there really isn't much we can do as tenants.
Very pro 2nd amendment!
1:48 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Where is all the green space in acorn alley?
Donald S
7:21 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Does money count as "green" space?